- Peringkat
- #297
- Total token output
- 118,380
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 39.90s
- Total Biaya
- $0.000
Cobuddy (medium) vs Grok 4.20
Cobuddy (medium) unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 4.7 vs 4.1. Cobuddy (medium) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.000 vs $0.057. Grok 4.20 lebih cepat di 1.11s vs 39.90s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 45.5% vs 27.3%.
Model yang Dibandingkan
- Peringkat
- #310
- Total token output
- 1,923
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 1.11s
- Total Biaya
- $0.057
Model yang direkomendasikan
Cobuddy (medium)
It has the strongest score in this comparison (4.7) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.
Perbandingan terperinci
| Metrik | Cobuddy Cobuddy medium | Grok 4.20 Grok 4.20 none |
|---|---|---|
| Skor | 4.7 | 4.1 |
| Peringkat | #297 | #310 |
| Keandalan | 10.0 | T/A |
| Konsistensi | 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Percobaan | 63/66 | 54/66 |
| Tes benar | ||
| Tingkat lulus per percobaan | 45.5% | 27.3% |
| Tes tidak stabil | 6 | 0 |
| Total Run | 63 | 54 |
| Biaya per hasil | 0.000 | 1.570 |
| Total Biaya | $0.000 | $0.057 |
| Harga input | $0.000 / 1M | $1.250 / 1M |
| Harga output | $0.000 / 1M | $2.500 / 1M |
| Total token input | 37,449 | 41,313 |
| Token output | 1,677 | 1,923 |
| Token penalaran | 116,703 | 0 |
| Waktu respons (rata-rata) | 39.90s | 1.11s |
| Waktu respons (maks) | 309.02s | 6.04s |
| Waktu respons (total) | 797.98s | 19.96s |
| Parameter | ~21B total (~3B aktif) | ~1T total (~100B aktif) |
| Ketersediaan | Tertutup | Tertutup |
Showcase generasi model
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#297 Cobuddy
medium
No endpoints found for baidu/cobuddy:free.
- Biaya
- $0.000
- Waktu
- 0.1s
- Token
- 0 tok
#310 xAI: Grok 4.20
none- Biaya
- $0.004
- Waktu
- 6.5s
- Token
- 1,367 tok
Model teratas berdasarkan skor
Skor vs Total Biaya
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Total token output
Skor vs Total token output
Rincian Kategori
Perbandingan Cepat
Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan
CobuddymediumvsMercury 2noneCobuddymediumvsGranite 4.2 8BhighTrinity Large PreviewnonevsCobuddymediumCobuddymediumvsGLM 4.7 FlashnoneCobuddymediumvsKAT-Coder-Air V2.5noneTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsCobuddymediumCobuddymediumvsGPT-5.4 NanononeCobuddymediumvsNemotron 3.5 LightninglowTersedia gratisCobuddymediumvsLaguna S 2.1noneTersedia gratisCobuddymediumvsRing-2.6-1TnoneCobuddymediumvsHy4 previewnoneCobuddymediumvsNemotron 3 SupernoneTersedia gratis