Navigasi
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Cobuddy (medium) vs Command A+

Cobuddy (medium) unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 4.4 vs 3.0. Biaya benchmark hampir imbang di $0.000 vs $0.000. Cobuddy (medium) lebih cepat di 38.01s vs 77.87s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 43.5% vs 0.0%.

Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-10-01

Model yang Dibandingkan

Peringkat
#337
Total token output
118,380
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
38.01s
Total Biaya
$0.000
Peringkat
#371
Total token output
0
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
77.87s
Total Biaya
$0.000
Model yang direkomendasikan Cobuddy (medium)

It has the best score here (4.4), while responding about 2.0x faster than Command A+.

Perbandingan terperinci

Metrik Cobuddy Cobuddy medium Rilis: 2026-05-06 Tersedia gratis Command A+ Command A+ none Rilis: 2026-09-23
Skor 4.4 3.0
Peringkat #337 #371
Keandalan 10.0 0.0
Konsistensi 7.3 10.0
Percobaan 66/69 69/69
Tes benar
Tingkat lulus per percobaan 43.5% 0.0%
Tes tidak stabil 6 0
Total Run 66 69
Biaya per hasil 0.000 0.000
Total Biaya $0.000 $0.000
Harga input $0.000 / 1M $0.300 / 1M
Harga output $0.000 / 1M $1.500 / 1M
Total token input 37,449 0
Token output 1,677 0
Token penalaran 116,703 0
Waktu respons (rata-rata) 38.01s 77.87s
Waktu respons (maks) 309.02s 106.37s
Waktu respons (total) 798.15s 1791.03s
Parameter ~21B total (~3B aktif) 218B total (25B aktif)
Ketersediaan Tertutup Sumber terbuka

Showcase generasi model

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#337 Cobuddy

medium
No endpoints found for baidu/cobuddy:free.
Biaya
$0.000
Waktu
0.1s
Token
0 tok

#371 Command A+

none
Provider returned error
Biaya
$0.000
Waktu
0.2s
Token
0 tok

Model teratas berdasarkan skor

Skor vs Total Biaya

Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Total token output

Skor vs Total token output

Rincian Kategori

Pemrograman Skor Konsistensi Tingkat lulus per percobaan Tes tidak stabil Tes benar Waktu respons (rata-rata) Token input Token output Token penalaran
Cobuddy 3.7 6.7 22.2% 1 79.17s 4,726 358 30,138
Command A+ 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 80.82s 0 0 0

Perbandingan Cepat

Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan

CobuddymediumTersedia gratisvsMercury 2noneCobuddymediumTersedia gratisvsGranite 4.2 8BnoneTrinity Large PreviewnoneTersedia gratisvsCobuddymediumTersedia gratisCobuddymediumTersedia gratisvsKAT Coder AIR V2.5noneCobuddymediumTersedia gratisvsNemotron 3 SupernoneTersedia gratisCobuddymediumTersedia gratisvsRing 2.6 1tnoneCobuddymediumTersedia gratisvsLing 2.6 FlashnoneCobuddymediumTersedia gratisvsgpt-oss-120bnoneCobuddymediumTersedia gratisvsNemotron 3.5 LightninglowTersedia gratisCobuddymediumTersedia gratisvsLaguna S 2.1lowTersedia gratisCobuddymediumTersedia gratisvsMercury 2.5noneCobuddymediumTersedia gratisvsGPT-5.4 Nanonone