Navigasi
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Trinity Large Thinking (medium) vs Qwen3.5-Flash

Qwen3.5-Flash unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 6.1 vs 6.0. Qwen3.5-Flash memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.073 vs $0.792. Qwen3.5-Flash lebih cepat di 25.28s vs 84.96s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 45.5% vs 39.4%.

Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-28

Peringkat
#150
Total token output
1,002,646
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
84.96s
Total Biaya
$0.792
Peringkat
#140
Total token output
209,201
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
25.28s
Total Biaya
$0.073
Model yang direkomendasikan Qwen3.5-Flash

It has the best score here (6.1), while costing about 10.9x less than Trinity Large Thinking (medium).

Perbandingan terperinci

Metrik Trinity Large Thinking Trinity Large Thinking medium Rilis: 2026-07-28 Qwen3.5-Flash Qwen3.5-Flash none Rilis: 2026-02-24
Skor 6.0 6.1
Peringkat #150 #140
Keandalan 10.0 10.0
Konsistensi 7.6 9.3
Tes benar
Tingkat lulus per percobaan 45.5% 39.4%
Tes tidak stabil 7 2
Total Run 66 66
Biaya per hasil 11.308 0.933
Total Biaya $0.792 $0.073
Harga input $0.220 / 1M $0.065 / 1M
Harga output $0.850 / 1M $0.260 / 1M
Total token input 118,477 282,347
Token output 148,823 209,201
Token penalaran 853,823 0
Waktu respons (rata-rata) 84.96s 25.28s
Waktu respons (maks) 525.14s 480.96s
Waktu respons (total) 1869.16s 556.24s

Showcase generasi model

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#150 Trinity Large Thinking

medium
Biaya
$0.016
Waktu
75.9s
Token
19,401 tok

#140 Qwen3.5-Flash

none
Biaya
$0.003
Waktu
47.4s
Token
7,799 tok

Model teratas berdasarkan skor

Skor vs Total Biaya

Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Total token output

Skor vs Total token output

Rincian Kategori

Pemrograman Skor Konsistensi Tingkat lulus per percobaan Tes tidak stabil Tes benar Waktu respons (rata-rata) Token input Token output Token penalaran
Trinity Large Thinking 7.5 10.0 66.7% 0 179.02s 7,248 7,413 351,155
Qwen3.5-Flash 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 850ms 7,913 519 0

Perbandingan Cepat

Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan