- Peringkat
- #27
- Total token output
- 17,992
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 6.99s
- Total Biaya
- $1.121
Claude Opus 5 (low) vs Gemini 3.5 Flash (low)
Gemini 3.5 Flash (low) unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 8.8 vs 8.7. Gemini 3.5 Flash (low) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.449 vs $1.121. Gemini 3.5 Flash (low) lebih cepat di 5.76s vs 6.99s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 83.3% vs 84.9%.
- Peringkat
- #24
- Total token output
- 35,195
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 5.76s
- Total Biaya
- $0.449
Model yang direkomendasikan
Gemini 3.5 Flash (low)
It has the best score here (8.8), while costing about 2.5x less than Claude Opus 5 (low).
Perbandingan terperinci
| Metrik | Claude Opus 5 Claude Opus 5 low | Gemini 3.5 Flash Gemini 3.5 Flash low |
|---|---|---|
| Skor | 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Peringkat | #27 | #24 |
| Keandalan | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Konsistensi | 9.6 | 9.3 |
| Percobaan | 66/66 | 66/66 |
| Tes benar | ||
| Tingkat lulus per percobaan | 83.3% | 84.9% |
| Tes tidak stabil | 1 | 2 |
| Total Run | 66 | 66 |
| Biaya per hasil | 6.223 | 2.492 |
| Total Biaya | $1.121 | $0.449 |
| Harga input | $5.000 / 1M | $1.500 / 1M |
| Harga output | $25.000 / 1M | $9.000 / 1M |
| Total token input | 134,770 | 87,826 |
| Token output | 13,604 | 2,239 |
| Token penalaran | 4,388 | 32,956 |
| Waktu respons (rata-rata) | 6.99s | 5.76s |
| Waktu respons (maks) | 30.67s | 53.55s |
| Waktu respons (total) | 153.80s | 126.71s |
| Parameter | ~5T total (~500B aktif) | ~500B total (~20B aktif) |
| Ketersediaan | Tertutup | Tertutup |
Showcase generasi model
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#27 Claude Opus 5
low- Biaya
- $0.062
- Waktu
- 30.2s
- Token
- 2,615 tok
#24 Gemini 3.5 Flash
low- Biaya
- $0.068
- Waktu
- 39.1s
- Token
- 7,588 tok
Model teratas berdasarkan skor
Skor vs Total Biaya
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Total token output
Skor vs Total token output
Rincian Kategori
| Trik anti-AI | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 5 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 4.32s | 834 | 1,008 | 376 | |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 2.52s | 494 | 209 | 2,536 |
| Pemrograman | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 5 | 7.8 | 7.4 | 77.8% | 1 | 6.70s | 10,590 | 2,442 | 760 | |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 7.8 | 10.0 | 66.7% | 0 | 6.71s | 8,118 | 458 | 13,420 |
| Gabungan | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 5 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 21.05s | 97,363 | 6,024 | 911 | |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 8.2 | 6.9 | 66.7% | 1 | 29.99s | 63,752 | 557 | 3,713 |
| Parsing dan ekstraksi data | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 5 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 3.69s | 10,503 | 343 | 79 | |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 1.81s | 7,548 | 279 | 1,164 |
| Spesifik domain | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 5 | 5.3 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 8.91s | 972 | 1,928 | 1,479 | |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 5.3 | 7.2 | 44.4% | 1 | 4.89s | 642 | 12 | 6,312 |
| Kecerdasan umum | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 5 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 3.76s | 708 | 293 | 0 | |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 2.27s | 486 | 119 | 916 |
| Kepatuhan instruksi | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 5 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 4.13s | 909 | 242 | 146 | |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 9.9 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 1.86s | 615 | 71 | 1,652 |
| Pemecahan teka-teki | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 5 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 4.23s | 894 | 607 | 300 | |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 2.35s | 558 | 288 | 2,150 |
| Pemanggilan alat | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 5 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 9.03s | 11,739 | 354 | 0 | |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 3.27s | 5,457 | 234 | 403 |
| Pengetahuan umum | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 5 | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 6.48s | 258 | 363 | 337 | |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 1.88s | 156 | 12 | 690 |
Perbandingan Cepat
Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan
Claude Opus 5lowvsGemini 3.5 Flash LitehighClaude Opus 4.8mediumvsGemini 3.5 FlashlowClaude Opus 5lowvsMuse Spark 1.2highSeed 2.1 TurbohighvsGemini 3.5 FlashlowClaude Opus 5lowvsMuse Spark 1.2mediumClaude Opus 5lowvsMuse Spark 1.1mediumClaude Opus 4.7mediumvsGemini 3.5 FlashlowGemini 3.5 FlashlowvsGPT-5.3-CodexmediumGemini 3.5 FlashlowvsMuse Spark 1.2highGemini 3.5 FlashlowvsGrok 4.5highClaude Opus 5lowvsQwen3.6 Max PreviewmediumClaude Opus 5lowvsSeed 2.1 Turbohigh