- Peringkat
- #133
- Total token output
- 32,506
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 11.87s
- Total Biaya
- $3.197
Claude Fable 5.1 (medium) vs GLM 5.3 FlashX (high)
GLM 5.3 FlashX (high) unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 7.4 vs 7.3. GLM 5.3 FlashX (high) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.210 vs $3.197. Claude Fable 5.1 (medium) lebih cepat di 11.87s vs 14.94s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 78.3% vs 69.6%.
Model yang Dibandingkan
- Peringkat
- #126
- Total token output
- 97,728
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 14.94s
- Total Biaya
- $0.210
Model yang direkomendasikan
GLM 5.3 FlashX (high)
It has the best score here (7.4), while costing about 15.3x less than Claude Fable 5.1 (medium).
Perbandingan terperinci
| Metrik | Claude Fable 5.1 Claude Fable 5.1 medium | GLM 5.3 FlashX GLM 5.3 FlashX high |
|---|---|---|
| Skor | 7.3 | 7.4 |
| Peringkat | #133 | #126 |
| Keandalan | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Konsistensi | 7.9 | 8.2 |
| Percobaan | 69/69 | 69/69 |
| Tes benar | ||
| Tingkat lulus per percobaan | 78.3% | 69.6% |
| Tes tidak stabil | 6 | 5 |
| Total Run | 69 | 69 |
| Biaya per hasil | 21.312 | 1.612 |
| Total Biaya | $3.197 | $0.210 |
| Harga input | $10.000 / 1M | $0.370 / 1M |
| Harga output | $50.000 / 1M | $1.250 / 1M |
| Total token input | 157,142 | 235,914 |
| Token output | 8,149 | 8,147 |
| Token penalaran | 24,357 | 89,581 |
| Waktu respons (rata-rata) | 11.87s | 14.94s |
| Waktu respons (maks) | 36.59s | 91.16s |
| Waktu respons (total) | 272.91s | 343.65s |
| Parameter | ~9.5T total (~878B aktif) | 320B total (18B aktif) |
| Ketersediaan | Tertutup | Tertutup |
Showcase generasi model
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#133 Claude Fable 5.1
medium- Biaya
- $0.244
- Waktu
- 65.9s
- Token
- 5,025 tok
#126 GLM 5.3 FlashX
high- Biaya
- $0.030
- Waktu
- 169.4s
- Token
- 23,950 tok
Model teratas berdasarkan skor
Skor vs Total Biaya
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Total token output
Skor vs Total token output
Rincian Kategori
| Tugas agen | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5.1 | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 16.18s | 22,030 | 555 | 799 | |
| GLM 5.3 FlashX | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 78.03s | 154,549 | 1,326 | 12,503 |
| Trik anti-AI | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5.1 | 8.2 | 7.9 | 83.3% | 1 | 5.18s | 858 | 485 | 334 | |
| GLM 5.3 FlashX | 8.2 | 7.9 | 83.3% | 1 | 1.98s | 639 | 425 | 606 |
| Pemrograman | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5.1 | 7.0 | 5.0 | 77.8% | 2 | 10.99s | 10,608 | 525 | 4,376 | |
| GLM 5.3 FlashX | 8.2 | 7.2 | 88.9% | 1 | 8.06s | 7,317 | 374 | 9,267 |
| Gabungan | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5.1 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 32.59s | 97,573 | 4,993 | 4,831 | |
| GLM 5.3 FlashX | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 27.73s | 56,585 | 4,123 | 15,563 |
| Parsing dan ekstraksi data | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5.1 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 4.47s | 10,515 | 312 | 0 | |
| GLM 5.3 FlashX | 7.3 | 5.8 | 83.3% | 1 | 1.82s | 7,149 | 298 | 285 |
| Spesifik domain | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5.1 | 7.7 | 10.0 | 66.7% | 0 | 19.29s | 990 | 63 | 9,185 | |
| GLM 5.3 FlashX | 3.6 | 7.2 | 22.2% | 1 | 50.04s | 759 | 506 | 48,992 |
| Kecerdasan umum | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5.1 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 5.14s | 714 | 280 | 0 | |
| GLM 5.3 FlashX | 6.1 | 3.1 | 66.7% | 1 | 2.28s | 498 | 169 | 229 |
| Kepatuhan instruksi | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5.1 | 7.3 | 5.8 | 83.3% | 1 | 5.77s | 921 | 146 | 183 | |
| GLM 5.3 FlashX | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 1.72s | 678 | 72 | 177 |
| Pemecahan teka-teki | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5.1 | 7.6 | 7.2 | 77.8% | 1 | 5.70s | 912 | 422 | 352 | |
| GLM 5.3 FlashX | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 2.06s | 672 | 462 | 434 |
| Pemanggilan alat | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5.1 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 12.99s | 11,757 | 354 | 0 | |
| GLM 5.3 FlashX | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 7.09s | 6,861 | 231 | 84 |
| Pengetahuan umum | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5.1 | 2.8 | 1.6 | 33.3% | 1 | 24.32s | 264 | 14 | 4,297 | |
| GLM 5.3 FlashX | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 5.34s | 207 | 161 | 1,441 |
Perbandingan Cepat
Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan
Seed-2.0-CodemediumvsGLM 5.3 FlashXhighGrok 4.7lowvsGLM 5.3 FlashXhighDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731lowvsGLM 5.3 FlashXhighClaude Fable 5.1mediumvsGLM 5.3 FlashhighQwen3.6 FlashmediumvsGLM 5.3 FlashXhighGPT-5.6 LunamediumvsGLM 5.3 FlashXhighClaude Fable 5.1mediumvsLongCat 2.0highDeepSeek V4 Pro 0423nonevsGLM 5.3 FlashXhighInklingmediumTersedia gratisvsGLM 5.3 FlashXhighGemma 4 26B A4BmediumTersedia gratisvsGLM 5.3 FlashXhighClaude Fable 5.1mediumvsQwen3.5-27BnoneClaude Fable 5.1mediumvsDeepSeek V4 Pro 0423none