Classement Appel d'outils
Voyez quels modèles d'IA réussissent le mieux sur Appel d'outils, lesquels restent fiables et où les écarts sont les plus marqués. Trier par: Tests corrects ↓.
442/442
Filtrer les modèles
Aucun modèle ne correspond à la recherche et aux filtres actuels.
| Rang | Modèle | Entreprise | Score Appel d'outils | Score | Coût total | Tests corrects | Temps de réponse (moy.) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #156 | Inkling medium | Thinkingmachines | 0.3 | 0.7 | $0.527 | 0/1 | 4.48s |
| #167 | Qwen3.8 27B medium | Qwen | 0.3 | 0.7 | ~$0.073 | 0/1 | 0ms |
| #183 | Kimi K2.7 Code medium | Moonshot AI | 0.3 | 0.7 | $1.136 | 0/1 | 0ms |
| #184 | Ember-1 low | Fireworks | 0.3 | 0.7 | $1.488 | 0/1 | 26.4s |
| #191 | Ember-1 high | Fireworks | 0.3 | 0.7 | $2.405 | 0/1 | 26.5s |
| #192 | Gemma 4 31B medium | 0.3 | 0.7 | $0.144 | 0/1 | 0ms | |
| #198 | Inkling low | Thinkingmachines | 0.3 | 0.7 | $0.293 | 0/1 | 2.57s |
| #199 | Mercury 2.5 Preview medium | Inception | 0.3 | 0.7 | $0.039 | 0/1 | 2.37s |
| #209 | Ember-1 max | Fireworks | 0.3 | 0.7 | $3.264 | 0/1 | 26.4s |
| #220 | Beam 1.0 501B A23B medium | Reflection | 0.3 | 0.7 | $0.499 | 0/1 | 1.95s |
| #223 | Qwen3.6 35B A3B medium | Qwen | 0.3 | 0.7 | $0.834 | 0/1 | 0ms |
| #224 | Mercury 2.5 Preview high | Inception | 0.3 | 0.6 | $0.040 | 0/1 | 2.25s |
| #226 | Beam 1.0 501B A23B xhigh | Reflection | 0.3 | 0.6 | $0.688 | 0/1 | 1.84s |
| #234 | Beam 1.0 501B A23B max | Reflection | 0.3 | 0.6 | $0.799 | 0/1 | 2.15s |
| #238 | Beam 1.0 501B A23B low | Reflection | 0.3 | 0.6 | $0.432 | 0/1 | 1.83s |