AI BENCHY
Comparer Graphiques Méthodologie
❤️ Made by XCS
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Catégorie AI BENCHY

Classement Intelligence générale

Voyez quels modèles d'IA réussissent le mieux sur Intelligence générale, lesquels restent fiables et où les écarts sont les plus marqués. Trier par: Temps de réponse (moy.) ↑.

Modèles affichés

55

Moyenne de Score Intelligence générale

6.1

Meilleur modèle

LFM2-24B-A2B 3.0
Rang Modèle Entreprise Score Intelligence générale Score moy. Tests corrects Temps de réponse (moy.)
#55 LFM2-24B-A2B none Liquid 3.0 2.6 0/1 395ms
#38 Gemini 2.5 Flash none Google 5.0 5.2 0/1 615ms
#51 Mercury 2 none Inception 4.0 3.4 0/1 628ms
#22 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview none Google 3.0 7.1 0/1 741ms
#37 Qwen3.5-Flash none Qwen 10.0 5.2 1/1 803ms
#36 Mercury 2 medium Inception 4.0 5.3 0/1 821ms
#47 GPT-4o-mini none OpenAI 3.0 4.0 0/1 909ms
#53 Grok 4.1 Fast none X AI 3.0 2.9 0/1 1.08s
#40 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B none Qwen 5.0 5.0 0/1 1.12s
#20 Gemini 3 Flash Preview none Google 10.0 7.2 1/1 1.13s
#42 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B none Qwen 6.0 4.7 0/1 1.19s
#48 Qwen3 Coder Next none Qwen 10.0 4.0 1/1 1.34s
#50 Qwen3 Coder Next medium Qwen 6.0 3.5 0/1 1.39s
#17 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview low Google 3.0 7.3 0/1 1.54s
#49 GLM 4.7 Flash none Z.ai 3.0 3.9 0/1 1.59s
#54 MiMo-V2-Flash none Xiaomi 4.0 2.9 0/1 1.67s
#44 GPT-5.4 none OpenAI 3.0 4.5 0/1 1.78s
#19 GPT-5.3 Chat none OpenAI 4.0 7.3 0/1 1.99s
#29 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 none Qwen 4.0 6.2 0/1 2.26s
#41 Qwen3.5-27B none Qwen 5.0 4.9 0/1 2.51s
#25 Claude Sonnet 4.6 none Anthropic 5.0 6.8 0/1 2.56s
#45 Trinity Large Preview none Arcee AI 3.0 4.2 0/1 2.86s
#33 DeepSeek V3.2 none DeepSeek 10.0 5.5 1/1 2.86s
#12 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview medium Google 10.0 7.5 1/1 3.16s
#15 GPT-5.2 Chat none OpenAI 4.0 7.4 0/1 3.20s
#31 GLM 5 none Z.ai 10.0 6.0 1/1 3.27s
#5 Gemini 3 Flash Preview low Google 10.0 8.2 1/1 3.68s
#46 Kimi K2.5 none Moonshot AI 10.0 4.1 1/1 4.00s
#1 Gemini 3 Flash Preview medium Google 10.0 10.0 1/1 4.09s
#21 MiMo-V2-Flash medium Xiaomi 3.0 7.2 0/1 4.20s
#27 GPT-5.2 medium OpenAI 10.0 6.5 0/1 4.32s
#16 Gemini 2.5 Flash medium Google 4.0 7.4 0/1 4.86s
#3 GPT-5.3-Codex medium OpenAI 4.0 8.4 0/1 4.87s
#9 GPT-5.4 medium OpenAI 5.0 8.0 0/1 4.92s
#11 Claude Sonnet 4.6 medium Anthropic 10.0 7.7 1/1 4.94s
#26 Claude Opus 4.6 medium Anthropic 10.0 6.6 1/1 5.04s
#8 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview high Google 10.0 8.2 1/1 5.25s
#13 Step 3.5 Flash medium Stepfun 6.0 7.4 0/1 6.54s
#43 MiniMax M2.5 medium Minimax 3.0 4.7 0/1 6.63s
#39 gpt-oss-120b medium OpenAI 3.0 5.1 0/1 7.90s
#6 Gemini 3 Pro Preview medium Google 10.0 8.2 1/1 9.34s
#2 Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview medium Google 10.0 9.4 1/1 11.8s
#32 GPT-5 Mini medium OpenAI 4.0 6.0 0/1 13.5s
#14 GLM 5 medium Z.ai 5.0 7.4 0/1 14.7s
#30 Grok 4.1 Fast medium X AI 3.0 6.2 0/1 16.2s
#34 GPT-5 Nano medium OpenAI 3.0 5.5 0/1 17.5s
#52 GLM 4.7 Flash medium Z.ai 10.0 3.1 0/1 18.1s
#35 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B medium Qwen 10.0 5.5 0/1 30.3s
#18 DeepSeek V3.2 medium DeepSeek 3.0 7.3 0/1 31.3s
#10 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B medium Qwen 10.0 7.7 0/1 34.1s
#23 Seed-2.0-Mini medium Bytedance Seed 6.0 6.9 0/1 36.7s
#24 Qwen3.5-Flash medium Qwen 5.0 6.9 0/1 40.1s
#28 Kimi K2.5 medium Moonshot AI 6.0 6.4 0/1 69.7s
#4 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 medium Qwen 10.0 8.3 0/1 79.9s
#7 Qwen3.5-27B medium Qwen 5.0 8.2 0/1 101.4s

Meilleurs modèles par Score Intelligence générale

Score Intelligence générale vs coût total

Meilleurs modèles par Temps de réponse (moy.)