AI BENCHY
Comparer Graphiques Méthodologie
❤️ Made by XCS
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Catégorie AI BENCHY

Classement Intelligence générale

Voyez quels modèles d'IA réussissent le mieux sur Intelligence générale, lesquels restent fiables et où les écarts sont les plus marqués. Trier par: Métrique ↑.

Modèles affichés

55

Moyenne de Score Intelligence générale

6.1

Rang Modèle Entreprise Score Intelligence générale Score moy. Tests corrects Temps de réponse (moy.)
#17 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview low Google 3.0 7.3 0/1 1.54s
#18 DeepSeek V3.2 medium DeepSeek 3.0 7.3 0/1 31.3s
#21 MiMo-V2-Flash medium Xiaomi 3.0 7.2 0/1 4.20s
#22 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview none Google 3.0 7.1 0/1 741ms
#30 Grok 4.1 Fast medium X AI 3.0 6.2 0/1 16.2s
#34 GPT-5 Nano medium OpenAI 3.0 5.5 0/1 17.5s
#39 gpt-oss-120b medium OpenAI 3.0 5.1 0/1 7.90s
#43 MiniMax M2.5 medium Minimax 3.0 4.7 0/1 6.63s
#44 GPT-5.4 none OpenAI 3.0 4.5 0/1 1.78s
#45 Trinity Large Preview none Arcee AI 3.0 4.2 0/1 2.86s
#47 GPT-4o-mini none OpenAI 3.0 4.0 0/1 909ms
#49 GLM 4.7 Flash none Z.ai 3.0 3.9 0/1 1.59s
#53 Grok 4.1 Fast none X AI 3.0 2.9 0/1 1.08s
#55 LFM2-24B-A2B none Liquid 3.0 2.6 0/1 395ms
#3 GPT-5.3-Codex medium OpenAI 4.0 8.4 0/1 4.87s
#15 GPT-5.2 Chat none OpenAI 4.0 7.4 0/1 3.20s
#16 Gemini 2.5 Flash medium Google 4.0 7.4 0/1 4.86s
#19 GPT-5.3 Chat none OpenAI 4.0 7.3 0/1 1.99s
#29 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 none Qwen 4.0 6.2 0/1 2.26s
#32 GPT-5 Mini medium OpenAI 4.0 6.0 0/1 13.5s
#36 Mercury 2 medium Inception 4.0 5.3 0/1 821ms
#51 Mercury 2 none Inception 4.0 3.4 0/1 628ms
#54 MiMo-V2-Flash none Xiaomi 4.0 2.9 0/1 1.67s
#7 Qwen3.5-27B medium Qwen 5.0 8.2 0/1 101.4s
#9 GPT-5.4 medium OpenAI 5.0 8.0 0/1 4.92s
#14 GLM 5 medium Z.ai 5.0 7.4 0/1 14.7s
#24 Qwen3.5-Flash medium Qwen 5.0 6.9 0/1 40.1s
#25 Claude Sonnet 4.6 none Anthropic 5.0 6.8 0/1 2.56s
#38 Gemini 2.5 Flash none Google 5.0 5.2 0/1 615ms
#40 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B none Qwen 5.0 5.0 0/1 1.12s
#41 Qwen3.5-27B none Qwen 5.0 4.9 0/1 2.51s
#13 Step 3.5 Flash medium Stepfun 6.0 7.4 0/1 6.54s
#23 Seed-2.0-Mini medium Bytedance Seed 6.0 6.9 0/1 36.7s
#28 Kimi K2.5 medium Moonshot AI 6.0 6.4 0/1 69.7s
#42 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B none Qwen 6.0 4.7 0/1 1.19s
#50 Qwen3 Coder Next medium Qwen 6.0 3.5 0/1 1.39s
#1 Gemini 3 Flash Preview medium Google 10.0 10.0 1/1 4.09s
#2 Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview medium Google 10.0 9.4 1/1 11.8s
#4 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 medium Qwen 10.0 8.3 0/1 79.9s
#5 Gemini 3 Flash Preview low Google 10.0 8.2 1/1 3.68s
#6 Gemini 3 Pro Preview medium Google 10.0 8.2 1/1 9.34s
#8 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview high Google 10.0 8.2 1/1 5.25s
#10 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B medium Qwen 10.0 7.7 0/1 34.1s
#11 Claude Sonnet 4.6 medium Anthropic 10.0 7.7 1/1 4.94s
#12 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview medium Google 10.0 7.5 1/1 3.16s
#20 Gemini 3 Flash Preview none Google 10.0 7.2 1/1 1.13s
#26 Claude Opus 4.6 medium Anthropic 10.0 6.6 1/1 5.04s
#27 GPT-5.2 medium OpenAI 10.0 6.5 0/1 4.32s
#31 GLM 5 none Z.ai 10.0 6.0 1/1 3.27s
#33 DeepSeek V3.2 none DeepSeek 10.0 5.5 1/1 2.86s
#35 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B medium Qwen 10.0 5.5 0/1 30.3s
#37 Qwen3.5-Flash none Qwen 10.0 5.2 1/1 803ms
#46 Kimi K2.5 none Moonshot AI 10.0 4.1 1/1 4.00s
#48 Qwen3 Coder Next none Qwen 10.0 4.0 1/1 1.34s
#52 GLM 4.7 Flash medium Z.ai 10.0 3.1 0/1 18.1s

Meilleurs modèles par Score Intelligence générale

Score Intelligence générale vs coût total

Meilleurs modèles par Temps de réponse (moy.)