Classement Programmation
Voyez quels modèles d'IA réussissent le mieux sur Programmation, lesquels restent fiables et où les écarts sont les plus marqués. Trier par: Coût total ↓.
404/404
Filtrer les modèles
Aucun modèle ne correspond à la recherche et aux filtres actuels.
| Rang | Modèle | Entreprise | Score Programmation | Score | Coût total | Tests corrects | Temps de réponse (moy.) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #66 | Grok 4.6 high | X AI | 1.0 | 0.9 | $2.629 | 3/3 | 102.2s |
| #76 | Muse Spark 1.1 high | Meta | 1.0 | 0.8 | $2.570 | 3/3 | 22.9s |
| #174 | Ember-1 high | Fireworks | 0.8 | 0.7 | $2.405 | 2/3 | 72.2s |
| #43 | Claude Opus 5 low | Anthropic | 0.8 | 0.9 | $2.350 | 2/3 | 6.70s |
| #178 | Claude Opus 4.8 none | Anthropic | 0.5 | 0.7 | $2.334 | 1/3 | 3.29s |
| #358 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview high | 0.0 | 0.4 | $2.310 | 0/0 | 0ms | |
| #114 | Grok 4.6 medium | X AI | 0.8 | 0.8 | $2.270 | 2/3 | 120.0s |
| #51 | GPT-5.4 medium | OpenAI | 0.9 | 0.9 | $2.213 | 2/3 | 44.4s |
| #14 | GPT-6 Astra low | OpenAI | 1.0 | 1.0 | $2.160 | 3/3 | 3.97s |
| #24 | Claude Opus 5.5 high | Anthropic | 1.0 | 0.9 | $2.133 | 3/3 | 13.4s |
| #216 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 medium | Anthropic | 0.6 | 0.6 | $2.126 | 1/3 | 33.3s |
| #341 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite high | 0.3 | 0.5 | $2.044 | 1/1 | 137.6s | |
| #58 | Seed 2.1 Turbo medium | Bytedance Seed | 0.8 | 0.9 | $2.042 | 2/3 | 354.9s |
| #46 | Muse Spark 1.2 high | Meta | 1.0 | 0.9 | $2.018 | 3/3 | 22.2s |
| #137 | Grok 4.7 low | X AI | 0.8 | 0.7 | $1.933 | 2/3 | 189.1s |