Classement Programmation
Voyez quels modèles d'IA réussissent le mieux sur Programmation, lesquels restent fiables et où les écarts sont les plus marqués. Trier par: Temps de réponse (moy.) ↑.
289/289
Filtrer les modèles
Aucun modèle ne correspond à la recherche et aux filtres actuels.
| Rang | Modèle | Entreprise | Score Programmation | Score | Coût total | Tests corrects | Temps de réponse (moy.) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #14 | Claude Opus 5 high | Anthropic | 10.0 | 9.2 | $3.070 | 3/3 | 12.7s |
| #29 | Claude Opus 4.7 medium | Anthropic | 7.6 | 8.7 | $1.476 | 2/3 | 13.0s |
| #133 | DeepSeek V4 Pro none | DeepSeek | 5.6 | 6.8 | $0.351 | 1/3 | 13.4s |
| #228 | Seed-2.0-Code none | Bytedance Seed | 3.6 | 5.3 | $0.151 | 0/3 | 13.4s |
| #2 | Gemini 3.7 Flash high | 10.0 | 9.8 | $0.323 | 3/3 | 13.6s | |
| #40 | Grok 4.5 low | X AI | 10.0 | 8.4 | $0.945 | 3/3 | 13.7s |
| #254 | KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 none | Kwaipilot | 3.3 | 4.8 | $0.070 | 0/3 | 14.3s |
| #256 | Trinity Large Preview none | Arcee AI | 3.7 | 4.8 | $0.008 | 0/3 | 14.3s |
| #272 | Laguna Xs.2 medium | Poolside | 2.1 | 4.1 | $0.015 | 0/1 | 14.4s |
| #244 | DeepSeek V3.2 none | DeepSeek | 3.1 | 5.0 | $0.054 | 0/3 | 14.5s |
| #3 | Gemini 3.6 Flash medium | 10.0 | 9.8 | $0.427 | 3/3 | 14.8s | |
| #161 | Ling-3.0-flash high | Inclusionai | 6.7 | 6.4 | $0.021 | 1/3 | 14.9s |
| #10 | GPT-5.5 low | OpenAI | 10.0 | 9.3 | $1.257 | 3/3 | 15.0s |
| #26 | Claude Opus 4.8 medium | Anthropic | 10.0 | 8.8 | $1.983 | 3/3 | 15.3s |
| #33 | Claude Fable 5 medium | Anthropic | 10.0 | 8.6 | $3.004 | 3/3 | 15.6s |