Ranking de Resolución de acertijos
Mira qué modelos de IA rinden mejor en Resolución de acertijos, cuáles se mantienen fiables y dónde aparecen las mayores diferencias. Ordenar por: Tiempo de respuesta (promedio) ↑.
Modelos mostrados
15
Promedio de Puntuación de Resolución de acertijos
0.7
Mejor modelo
Step 3.5 Flash 0.0
451/451
Filtrar modelos
Ningún modelo coincide con la búsqueda y los filtros actuales.
| Rango | Modelo | Empresa | Puntuación de Resolución de acertijos | Puntuación | Costo total | Pruebas correctas | Tiempo de respuesta (promedio) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #408 | Ling 3.0 Tiny high | Inclusionai | 0.3 | 0.4 | $0.000 | 0/3 | 54.2s |
| #149 | Mistral Large 4 high | Mistral | 0.5 | 0.8 | $1.391 | 1/3 | 55.2s |
| #258 | Solar Pro 4 high | Upstage | 0.9 | 0.6 | $0.077 | 2/3 | 55.2s |
| #106 | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 high | DeepSeek | 0.7 | 0.8 | $0.149 | 1/3 | 56.8s |
| #207 | Solar Pro 4 xhigh | Upstage | 0.9 | 0.7 | $0.067 | 2/3 | 58.0s |
| #116 | Qwen3.5-27B medium | Qwen | 0.8 | 0.8 | $1.135 | 2/3 | 59.6s |
| #279 | Step 5 Preview medium | Stepfun | 0.8 | 0.6 | $4.136 | 2/3 | 59.9s |
| #177 | Qwen3.6 27B medium | Qwen | 0.8 | 0.7 | $1.021 | 2/3 | 61.1s |
| #141 | Muse Glimmer 30B medium | Meta | 0.6 | 0.8 | $0.288 | 1/3 | 64.7s |
| #136 | Muse Glimmer 30B high | Meta | 0.6 | 0.8 | $0.506 | 1/3 | 64.8s |
| #133 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 medium | DeepSeek | 0.8 | 0.8 | $0.460 | 2/3 | 65.1s |
| #122 | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B high | Qwen | 1.0 | 0.8 | $2.949 | 3/3 | 65.5s |
| #88 | Muse Spark 1.1 high | Meta | 0.8 | 0.8 | $2.570 | 2/3 | 70.0s |
| #280 | Granite 4.2 8B medium | IBM Granite | 0.3 | 0.6 | $0.029 | 0/3 | 76.0s |
| #423 | Command A+ high | Cohere | 0.3 | 0.3 | $0.079 | 0/3 | 86.2s |