Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

xAI: Grok 4.5 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.2

Grok 4.5 (medium) leads on average score with 8.3 vs 8.0. GLM 5.2 (high) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.929 vs $1.928. Grok 4.5 (medium) is faster at 61.71s vs 62.65s, with pass rates of 78.8% vs 71.2%.

Recommended modelGLM 5.2 (high)Its score stays close to the best score here (8.0 vs 8.3), while costing about 2.1x less than Grok 4.5 (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-17

Metric Grok 4.5 Grok 4.5 medium Release: 2026-07-08 GLM 5.2 GLM 5.2 high Release: 2026-06-17
Score 8.3 8.0
Rank #22 #30
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.9 8.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 78.8% 71.2%
Flaky tests 3 3
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 12.049 5.873
Total Cost $1.928 $0.929
Input Price $2.000 / 1M $0.919 / 1M
Output Price $6.000 / 1M $2.887 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 122,146 83,813
Output Tokens 5,514 69,688
Reasoning Tokens 275,053 225,659
Response Time (avg) 61.71s 62.65s
Response Time (max) 436.38s 599.43s
Response Time (total) 1357.56s 1378.34s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#22 xAI: Grok 4.5

medium
Cost
$0.044
Time
59.4s
Tokens
7,512 tok

#30 GLM 5.2

high
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Grok 4.5 7.6 7.2 77.8% 1 155.69s 9,579 390 104,634
GLM 5.2 6.4 8.6 33.3% 0 73.03s 5,124 2,302 22,546

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair