Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Qwen3 Coder Next vs Inkling

Inkling leads on average score with 5.2 vs 5.1. Qwen3 Coder Next has the lower benchmark cost at $0.026 vs $0.142. Inkling is faster at 3.47s vs 8.63s, with pass rates of 25.8% vs 28.8%.

Last updated at: 2026-08-15

Rank
#235
Total Output Tokens
11,808
Response Time (avg)
8.63s
Total Cost
$0.026
Rank
#231
Total Output Tokens
10,554
Response Time (avg)
3.47s
Total Cost
$0.142
Recommended model Qwen3 Coder Next

Its score stays close to the best score here (5.1 vs 5.2), while costing about 5.5x less than Inkling.

Detailed comparison

Metric Qwen3 Coder Next Qwen3 Coder Next none Release: 2026-02-03 Inkling Inkling none Release: 2026-07-18
Score 5.1 5.2
Rank #235 #231
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.7 9.6
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 25.8% 28.8%
Flaky tests 1 1
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.488 2.448
Total Cost $0.026 $0.142
Input Price $0.120 / 1M $0.950 / 1M
Output Price $0.800 / 1M $4.050 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 134,227 104,120
Output Tokens 11,808 10,554
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 8.63s 3.47s
Response Time (max) 45.14s 48.02s
Response Time (total) 146.72s 76.28s
Parameters 80B total (3B active) 975B total (41B active)
Availability Open source Open source

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#235 Qwen3 Coder Next

none
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.058
Time
246.3s
Tokens
64,126 tok

#231 Thinking Machines: Inkling

none
Provider returned error
Cost
$0.000
Time
5.3s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3 Coder Next 4.6 7.9 22.2% 1 2.22s 7,442 621 0
Inkling 4.5 10.0 0.0% 0 1.01s 7,356 436 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair