Navigate
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Compared models

Qwen3.8 27B (high) vs Qwen3.8 27B (medium) vs Qwen3.8 27B (low) vs Qwen3.8 27B benchmark comparison: Qwen3.8 27B (high) leads on Score with 8.7. Qwen3.8 27B (low) leads on Reliability with 10.0. Qwen3.8 27B has the lowest Total Cost at ~$0.010. Qwen3.8 27B is fastest at 5.05s.

Last updated at: 2026-10-01

Compared models

Rank
#55
Total Output Tokens
677,080
Response Time (avg)
166.34s
Total Cost
~$0.298
Rank
#141
Total Output Tokens
170,696
Response Time (avg)
40.09s
Total Cost
~$0.073
Rank
#117
Total Output Tokens
209,143
Response Time (avg)
46.60s
Total Cost
~$0.089
Rank
#272
Total Output Tokens
13,791
Response Time (avg)
5.05s
Total Cost
~$0.010
Recommended model Qwen3.8 27B (high)

It has the strongest score in this comparison (8.7) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 4 models.

Detailed comparison

Metric Qwen3.8 27B Qwen3.8 27B high Release: 2026-08-14 Free Available Qwen3.8 27B Qwen3.8 27B medium Release: 2026-08-14 Free Available Qwen3.8 27B Qwen3.8 27B low Release: 2026-08-14 Free Available Qwen3.8 27B Qwen3.8 27B none Release: 2026-08-14 Free Available
Score 8.7 7.2 7.6 5.4
Rank #55 #141 #117 #272
Reliability 9.7 9.7 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.2 9.4 9.7 10.0
Attempts 69/69 69/69 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 78.3% 66.7% 68.1% 39.1%
Flaky tests 2 2 1 0
Total Runs 69 69 69 69
Cost per result ~1.751 ~0.520 ~0.589 ~0.107
Total Cost ~$0.298 ~$0.073 ~$0.089 ~$0.010
Input Price N/A N/A N/A N/A
Output Price N/A N/A N/A N/A
Total Input Tokens 348,967 277,164 315,290 281,460
Output Tokens 1,005 1,913 1,607 13,791
Reasoning Tokens 676,075 168,783 207,536 0
Response Time (avg) 166.34s 40.09s 46.60s 5.05s
Response Time (max) 640.85s 214.63s 376.04s 47.42s
Response Time (total) 3825.81s 881.89s 1071.83s 116.11s
Parameters 27.3B 27.3B 27.3B 27.3B
Availability Weights available Weights available Weights available Weights available

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#55 Qwen3.8 27B

high
Cost
~$0.008
Time
270.1s
Tokens
18,963 tok

#141 Qwen3.8 27B

medium
Cost
~$0.002
Time
43.4s
Tokens
2,956 tok

#117 Qwen3.8 27B

low
Cost
~$0.003
Time
92.8s
Tokens
6,902 tok

#272 Qwen3.8 27B

none
Cost
~$0.001
Time
23.9s
Tokens
1,922 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.8 27B 8.1 7.0 88.9% 1 248.62s 8,235 346 143,335
Qwen3.8 27B 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 40.50s 7,893 585 26,808
Qwen3.8 27B 7.7 10.0 66.7% 0 140.92s 8,127 585 86,694
Qwen3.8 27B 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 1.19s 7,911 408 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair

Gemini 3.8 FlashlowvsQwen3.8 27BmediumFree AvailableGPT-5.2mediumvsQwen3.8 27BhighFree AvailableQwen3.8 27BhighFree AvailablevsMiMo-V2.6-PromediumSeed 2.1 TurbomediumvsQwen3.8 27BhighFree AvailableClaude Opus 4.8lowvsQwen3.8 27BmediumFree AvailableGPT-6 SollowvsQwen3.8 27BhighFree AvailableQwen3.8 27BlowFree AvailablevsSpace Bunny AlphahighQwen3.8 27BlowFree AvailablevsGLM 5.1mediumNorth Mini CodemediumFree AvailablevsQwen3.8 27BnoneFree AvailableQwen3.8 27BnoneFree AvailablevsHy4 previewlowQwen3.8 27BmediumFree AvailablevsStep 3.7 FlashlowDeepSeek V4.1 FlashmaxvsQwen3.8 27BhighFree Available