Navigate
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (high) vs GLM 5.3 (high)

The average score is effectively tied at 7.9 vs 7.8. GLM 5.3 (high) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.610 vs $2.949. GLM 5.3 (high) is faster at 28.38s vs 120.88s, with pass rates of 75.4% vs 75.4%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-03

Compared models

Rank
#103
Total Output Tokens
468,439
Response Time (avg)
120.88s
Total Cost
$2.949
Rank
#107
Total Output Tokens
68,482
Response Time (avg)
28.38s
Total Cost
$0.610
Recommended model GLM 5.3 (high)

It has the best score here (7.8), while costing about 4.8x less than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (high).

Detailed comparison

Metric Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B high Release: 2026-08-12 GLM 5.3 GLM 5.3 high Release: 2026-08-20
Score 7.9 7.8
Rank #103 #107
Reliability 9.6 10.0
Consistency 8.4 7.6
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 75.4% 75.4%
Flaky tests 4 7
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 18.696 4.351
Total Cost $2.949 $0.610
Input Price $2.000 / 1M $1.400 / 1M
Output Price $6.000 / 1M $4.400 / 1M
Cache Read Price $0.250 / 1M $0.140 / 1M
Cache Write Price N/A N/A
Total Input Tokens 295,642 219,811
Output Tokens 115,041 8,811
Reasoning Tokens 353,398 59,671
Response Time (avg) 120.88s 28.38s
Response Time (max) 532.28s 159.91s
Response Time (total) 2780.16s 652.78s
Parameters 2.4T total (95B active) 744B total (40B active)
Availability Weights available Closed

Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#103 Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

high
Reached the allocated time limit (600 seconds) without receiving showcase output.
Cost
$0.000
Time
600.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#107 GLM 5.3

high
Cost
$0.085
Time
362.5s
Tokens
19,310 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B 5.9 6.3 55.6% 1 160.52s 6,399 3,310 48,078
GLM 5.3 6.6 5.0 66.7% 2 18.89s 7,317 473 8,190

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair