Navigate
Advertise here

Qwen3.7 Plus (medium) vs Qwen3.8 27B (low)

The average score is effectively tied at 7.9 vs 7.9. Qwen3.8 27B (low) has the lower benchmark cost at ~$0.071 vs $0.277. Qwen3.8 27B (low) is faster at 39.11s vs 53.51s, with pass rates of 75.8% vs 68.2%.

Last updated at: 2026-09-28

Compared models

Rank
#95
Total Output Tokens
187,337
Response Time (avg)
53.51s
Total Cost
$0.277
Rank
#93
Total Output Tokens
169,329
Response Time (avg)
39.11s
Total Cost
~$0.071
Recommended model Qwen3.8 27B (low)

It has the best score here (7.9), while costing about 3.9x less than Qwen3.7 Plus (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Qwen3.7 Plus Qwen3.7 Plus medium Release: 2026-06-03 Qwen3.8 27B Qwen3.8 27B low Release: 2026-08-14
Score 7.9 7.9
Rank #95 #93
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.9 10.0
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 75.8% 68.2%
Flaky tests 3 0
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 2.134 ~0.473
Total Cost $0.277 ~$0.071
Input Price $0.320 / 1M N/A
Output Price $1.280 / 1M N/A
Total Input Tokens 115,242 99,705
Output Tokens 6,163 1,545
Reasoning Tokens 181,174 167,784
Response Time (avg) 53.51s 39.11s
Response Time (max) 315.30s 376.04s
Response Time (total) 1177.25s 860.51s
Parameters ~397B total (~17B active) 27.3B
Availability Closed Weights available

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#95 Qwen3.7 Plus

medium
Cost
$0.018
Time
193.2s
Tokens
10,821 tok

#93 Qwen3.8 27B

low
Cost
~$0.003
Time
92.8s
Tokens
6,902 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.7 Plus 6.1 6.6 55.6% 1 108.60s 6,472 414 43,576
Qwen3.8 27B 7.7 10.0 66.7% 0 140.92s 8,127 585 86,694

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair