Navigate
Advertise here

Qwen3.7 Max vs Grok 4.6 (medium)

Qwen3.7 Max leads on average score with 7.9 vs 7.8. Qwen3.7 Max has the lower benchmark cost at $0.492 vs $2.270. Qwen3.7 Max is faster at 7.85s vs 74.77s, with pass rates of 69.6% vs 78.3%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-01

Compared models

Rank
#100
Total Output Tokens
20,670
Response Time (avg)
7.85s
Total Cost
$0.492
Rank
#107
Total Output Tokens
266,197
Response Time (avg)
74.77s
Total Cost
$2.270
Recommended model Qwen3.7 Max

It has the best score here (7.9), while costing about 4.6x less than Grok 4.6 (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Qwen3.7 Max Qwen3.7 Max none Release: 2026-05-22 Grok 4.6 Grok 4.6 medium Release: 2026-08-12
Score 7.9 7.8
Rank #100 #107
Reliability 9.9 10.0
Consistency 10.0 8.7
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 69.6% 78.3%
Flaky tests 0 4
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 3.070 14.187
Total Cost $0.492 $2.270
Input Price $1.475 / 1M $2.000 / 1M
Output Price $4.425 / 1M $6.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 243,553 336,351
Output Tokens 20,670 6,180
Reasoning Tokens 0 260,017
Response Time (avg) 7.85s 74.77s
Response Time (max) 80.34s 514.35s
Response Time (total) 180.65s 1719.73s
Parameters ~1T total (~40B active) ~1.7T total (~170B active)
Availability Closed Closed

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#100 Qwen3.7 Max

none
Cost
$0.046
Time
195.0s
Tokens
12,171 tok

#107 SpaceXAI: Grok 4.6

medium
Cost
$0.028
Time
72.1s
Tokens
4,771 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.7 Max 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 1.35s 7,911 582 0
Grok 4.6 8.2 7.2 88.9% 1 120.05s 9,579 351 64,226

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair