Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Qwen3.7 Flash (low) vs GLM 5.1 (medium)

Qwen3.7 Flash (low) leads on average score with 7.3 vs 7.1. Qwen3.7 Flash (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.042 vs $0.535. Qwen3.7 Flash (low) is faster at 36.80s vs 46.77s, with pass rates of 68.2% vs 69.7%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-28

Rank
#75
Total Output Tokens
297,249
Response Time (avg)
36.80s
Total Cost
$0.042
Rank
#84
Total Output Tokens
152,552
Response Time (avg)
46.77s
Total Cost
$0.535
Recommended model Qwen3.7 Flash (low)

It has the best score here (7.3), while costing about 12.9x less than GLM 5.1 (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Qwen3.7 Flash Qwen3.7 Flash low Release: 2026-07-28 GLM 5.1 GLM 5.1 medium Release: 2026-04-07
Score 7.3 7.1
Rank #75 #84
Reliability 9.9 8.3
Consistency 8.4 8.4
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 68.2% 69.7%
Flaky tests 5 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.346 4.202
Total Cost $0.042 $0.535
Input Price $0.030 / 1M $0.966 / 1M
Output Price $0.130 / 1M $3.036 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 92,182 82,623
Output Tokens 14,287 16,089
Reasoning Tokens 282,962 136,463
Response Time (avg) 36.80s 46.77s
Response Time (max) 394.54s 308.75s
Response Time (total) 809.54s 982.16s

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#75 Qwen3.7 Flash

low
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
600.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#84 GLM 5.1

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.7 Flash 6.7 7.8 55.6% 1 42.36s 7,893 428 56,419
GLM 5.1 4.6 3.7 44.5% 2 109.63s 5,702 4,871 37,826

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair