Navigate
Advertise here

Qwen3.7 Flash (low) vs Step 3.7 Flash (medium)

Step 3.7 Flash (medium) leads on average score with 7.8 vs 7.7. Qwen3.7 Flash (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.053 vs $0.571. Step 3.7 Flash (medium) is faster at 26.57s vs 41.03s, with pass rates of 68.1% vs 68.1%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-01

Compared models

Rank
#114
Total Output Tokens
331,107
Response Time (avg)
41.03s
Total Cost
$0.053
Rank
#106
Total Output Tokens
440,835
Response Time (avg)
26.57s
Total Cost
$0.571
Recommended model Qwen3.7 Flash (low)

Its score stays close to the best score here (7.7 vs 7.8), while costing about 10.9x less than Step 3.7 Flash (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Qwen3.7 Flash Qwen3.7 Flash low Release: 2026-07-28 Step 3.7 Flash Step 3.7 Flash medium Release: 2026-05-29
Score 7.7 7.8
Rank #114 #106
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.1 8.7
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 68.1% 68.1%
Flaky tests 6 4
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 0.439 4.392
Total Cost $0.053 $0.571
Input Price $0.030 / 1M $0.200 / 1M
Output Price $0.130 / 1M $1.150 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 318,058 319,524
Output Tokens 16,035 440,835
Reasoning Tokens 315,072 0
Response Time (avg) 41.03s 26.57s
Response Time (max) 394.54s 152.83s
Response Time (total) 943.75s 611.09s
Parameters ~35B total (~3B active) 198B total (11B active)
Availability Closed Open source

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#114 Qwen3.7 Flash

low
Reached the allocated time limit (600 seconds) without receiving showcase output.
Cost
$0.000
Time
600.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#106 Step 3.7 Flash

medium
Cost
$0.006
Time
46.2s
Tokens
4,466 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.7 Flash 6.7 7.8 55.6% 1 42.36s 7,893 428 56,419
Step 3.7 Flash 8.8 7.8 88.9% 1 27.42s 7,437 44,797 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair

Muse Glimmer 30BmediumvsQwen3.7 FlashlowStep 3.7 FlashmediumvsGLM 5.3highMuse Glimmer 30BhighvsQwen3.7 FlashlowGPT-6 LunahighvsQwen3.7 FlashlowQwen3.7 PlusnonevsStep 3.7 FlashmediumStep 3.7 FlashmediumvsGrok 4.5lowQwen3.8 2.4T A95BhighvsStep 3.7 FlashmediumDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731mediumvsQwen3.7 FlashlowQwen3.7 MaxnonevsStep 3.7 FlashmediumGPT-6 LunahighvsStep 3.7 FlashmediumMuse Glimmer 30BhighvsStep 3.7 FlashmediumClaude Fable 5.1highvsStep 3.7 Flashmedium