Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

AI BENCHY Compare

Qwen: Qwen3.6 Plus vs Z.ai: GLM 5.2

Summary

Qwen3.6 Plus vs GLM 5.2 benchmark comparison: Qwen3.6 Plus leads on average score with 7.8 vs 7.1. GLM 5.2 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.051 vs $0.294. GLM 5.2 is faster at 6.34s vs 30.70s, with pass rates of 69.8% vs 60.3%.

Recommended model: GLM 5.2 - Its score stays close to the best score here (7.1 vs 7.8), while costing about 5.8x less than Qwen3.6 Plus.

Last updated at: 2026-07-02

Metric Qwen3.6 Plus Qwen3.6 Plus medium Release: 2026-04-20 GLM 5.2 GLM 5.2 none Release: 2026-06-17
Score 7.8 7.1
Rank #31 #63
Reliability 10.0 9.9
Consistency 9.3 9.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 69.8% 60.3%
Flaky tests 2 1
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 0.831 0.628
Total Cost $0.294 $0.051
Input Price $0.325 / 1M $0.930 / 1M
Output Price $1.950 / 1M $3.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 41,565 38,671
Output Tokens 1,853 4,817
Reasoning Tokens 141,973 0
Response Time (avg) 30.70s 6.34s
Response Time (max) 201.68s 20.69s
Response Time (total) 613.99s 133.19s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#31 Qwen3.6 Plus

medium
Cost
$0.024
Time
219.0s
Tokens
12,235 tok

#63 GLM 5.2

none
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.033
Time
87.7s
Tokens
7,455 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Anti-AI Tricks Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.6 Plus 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 9.90s 672 207 7,557
GLM 5.2 8.3 10.0 75.0% 0 3.70s 567 313 0
Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.6 Plus 6.1 7.8 44.4% 1 153.12s 7,098 58 50,586
GLM 5.2 3.7 9.5 0.0% 0 7.55s 7,263 1,958 0
Combined Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.6 Plus 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 34.95s 14,934 452 13,073
GLM 5.2 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 20.69s 14,296 1,489 0
Data parsing and extraction Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.6 Plus 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 14.95s 7,782 270 10,706
GLM 5.2 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 7.17s 7,113 204 0
Domain specific Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.6 Plus 2.9 7.2 11.1% 1 29.59s 771 56 33,464
GLM 5.2 5.3 10.0 33.3% 0 6.50s 696 27 0
General Intelligence Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.6 Plus 5.1 10.0 0.0% 0 27.05s 516 111 5,232
GLM 5.2 6.1 3.1 66.7% 1 4.42s 480 82 0
Instructions following Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.6 Plus 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 7.54s 699 102 5,552
GLM 5.2 9.8 10.0 100.0% 0 3.84s 642 66 0
Puzzle Solving Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.6 Plus 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 6.34s 696 309 6,712
GLM 5.2 7.7 10.0 66.7% 0 3.31s 618 265 0
Tool Calling Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.6 Plus 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 5.87s 8,193 267 1,330
GLM 5.2 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 15.76s 6,807 400 0
Trivia Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.6 Plus 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 47.51s 204 21 7,761
GLM 5.2 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 3.41s 189 13 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair

Gemma 4 26B A4BmediumFree AvailablevsGLM 5.2noneStep 3.7 FlashhighvsGLM 5.2noneLaguna XS 2.1mediumFree AvailablevsGLM 5.2noneClaude Opus 4.8lowvsQwen3.6 PlusmediumKimi K2.7 CodemediumvsGLM 5.2noneQwen3.6 PlusmediumvsStep 3.7 FlashlowGrok 4.20mediumvsGLM 5.2noneDeepSeek V4 ProhighvsQwen3.6 PlusmediumGemini 3 Flash PreviewlowvsGLM 5.2noneMiMo-V2.5-PromediumvsGLM 5.2noneSeed-2.0-MinimediumvsGLM 5.2noneQwen3.5-FlashmediumvsGLM 5.2none