Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Qwen3.6 Plus (medium) vs GLM 5.2 (medium)

The average score is effectively tied at 7.8 vs 7.8. GLM 5.2 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.176 vs $0.405. GLM 5.2 (medium) is faster at 23.28s vs 43.12s, with pass rates of 71.2% vs 80.3%.

Last updated at: 2026-08-01

Rank
#48
Total Output Tokens
191,237
Response Time (avg)
43.12s
Total Cost
$0.405
Rank
#49
Total Output Tokens
61,761
Response Time (avg)
23.28s
Total Cost
$0.176
Recommended model GLM 5.2 (medium)

It has the best score here (7.8), while costing about 2.3x less than Qwen3.6 Plus (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Qwen3.6 Plus Qwen3.6 Plus medium Release: 2026-04-20 GLM 5.2 GLM 5.2 medium Release: 2026-06-17
Score 7.8 7.8
Rank #48 #49
Reliability 10.0 9.5
Consistency 9.3 8.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 71.2% 80.3%
Flaky tests 2 4
Total Runs 66 63
Cost per result 1.514 2.159
Total Cost $0.405 $0.176
Input Price $0.325 / 1M $0.761 / 1M
Output Price $1.950 / 1M $2.389 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 97,689 37,199
Output Tokens 6,412 12,261
Reasoning Tokens 184,825 49,500
Response Time (avg) 43.12s 23.28s
Response Time (max) 291.55s 101.36s
Response Time (total) 905.53s 488.94s

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#48 Qwen3.6 Plus

medium
Cost
$0.024
Time
219.0s
Tokens
12,235 tok

#49 GLM 5.2

medium
Cost
$0.041
Time
195.8s
Tokens
9,287 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.6 Plus 6.1 7.8 44.4% 1 153.12s 7,098 58 50,586
GLM 5.2 8.2 7.2 88.9% 1 40.96s 7,317 1,475 17,123

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair