Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Qwen3.6 Plus (medium) vs Qwen3.8 27B (low)

Qwen3.8 27B (low) leads on average score with 7.9 vs 7.8. Local hardware cost was not measured, so cost comparisons are unavailable. Qwen3.8 27B (low) is faster at 39.11s vs 45.52s, with pass rates of 71.2% vs 68.2%.

Last updated at: 2026-08-15

Rank
#63
Total Output Tokens
197,632
Response Time (avg)
45.52s
Total Cost
$0.418
Rank
#61
Total Output Tokens
169,329
Response Time (avg)
39.11s
Total Cost
N/A
Recommended model Qwen3.6 Plus (medium)

It has the best overall balance of score, reliability, cost, and response time in this comparison.

Detailed comparison

Metric Qwen3.6 Plus Qwen3.6 Plus medium Release: 2026-04-20 Qwen3.8 27B Qwen3.8 27B low Release: 2026-08-14
Score 7.8 7.9
Rank #63 #61
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.3 10.0
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 71.2% 68.2%
Flaky tests 2 0
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 1.695 N/A
Total Cost $0.418 N/A
Input Price $0.325 / 1M N/A
Output Price $1.950 / 1M N/A
Total Input Tokens 97,698 99,705
Output Tokens 6,417 1,545
Reasoning Tokens 191,215 167,784
Response Time (avg) 45.52s 39.11s
Response Time (max) 291.55s 376.04s
Response Time (total) 955.94s 860.51s
Parameters ~397B total (~17B active) 27.3B
Availability Closed Weights available

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#63 Qwen3.6 Plus

medium
Cost
$0.024
Time
219.0s
Tokens
12,235 tok

#61 Qwen3.8 27B

low
Cost
N/A
Time
92.8s
Tokens
6,902 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.6 Plus 6.1 7.8 44.4% 1 153.12s 7,098 58 50,586
Qwen3.8 27B 7.7 10.0 66.7% 0 140.92s 8,127 585 86,694

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair