Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Qwen3.6 Max Preview (medium) vs Inkling Small (high)

Qwen3.6 Max Preview (medium) leads on average score with 8.4 vs 8.4. Inkling Small (high) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.416 vs $1.129. Inkling Small (high) is faster at 31.70s vs 67.53s, with pass rates of 80.3% vs 69.7%.

Last updated at: 2026-08-01

Rank
#27
Total Output Tokens
169,940
Response Time (avg)
67.53s
Total Cost
$1.129
Rank
#30
Total Output Tokens
310,388
Response Time (avg)
31.70s
Total Cost
$0.416
Recommended model Inkling Small (high)

Its score stays close to the best score here (8.4 vs 8.4), while costing about 2.7x less than Qwen3.6 Max Preview (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Qwen3.6 Max Preview Qwen3.6 Max Preview medium Release: 2026-04-20 Inkling Small Inkling Small high Release: 2026-08-01
Score 8.4 8.4
Rank #27 #30
Reliability 9.9 10.0
Consistency 8.9 9.2
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 80.3% 69.7%
Flaky tests 3 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 8.173 2.967
Total Cost $1.129 $0.416
Input Price $1.028 / 1M $0.500 / 1M
Output Price $6.162 / 1M $1.200 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 79,240 85,660
Output Tokens 5,098 6,092
Reasoning Tokens 164,842 304,296
Response Time (avg) 67.53s 31.70s
Response Time (max) 238.07s 122.60s
Response Time (total) 1485.64s 697.30s

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#27 Qwen3.6 Max Preview

medium
Cost
$0.024
Time
76.5s
Tokens
3,861 tok

#30 Thinking Machines: Inkling Small

high
Cost
$0.006
Time
34.7s
Tokens
4,735 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.6 Max Preview 8.8 7.8 88.9% 1 146.48s 7,895 427 52,957
Inkling Small 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 93.23s 7,374 463 120,474

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair