Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Qwen3.6 35B A3B vs Inkling Small

The average score is effectively tied at 5.3 vs 5.3. Inkling Small has the lower benchmark cost at $0.058 vs $0.061. Inkling Small is faster at 1.51s vs 5.52s, with pass rates of 31.8% vs 24.2%.

Last updated at: 2026-08-01

Rank
#189
Total Output Tokens
46,957
Response Time (avg)
5.52s
Total Cost
$0.061
Rank
#187
Total Output Tokens
8,770
Response Time (avg)
1.51s
Total Cost
$0.058
Recommended model Inkling Small

It has the best score here (5.3), while responding about 3.6x faster than Qwen3.6 35B A3B.

Detailed comparison

Metric Qwen3.6 35B A3B Qwen3.6 35B A3B none Release: 2026-04-20 Inkling Small Inkling Small none Release: 2026-08-01
Score 5.3 5.3
Rank #189 #187
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 7.7 9.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 31.8% 24.2%
Flaky tests 6 1
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 1.496 1.158
Total Cost $0.061 $0.058
Input Price $0.140 / 1M $0.500 / 1M
Output Price $1.000 / 1M $1.200 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 93,979 94,724
Output Tokens 46,957 8,770
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 5.52s 1.51s
Response Time (max) 39.54s 12.35s
Response Time (total) 110.40s 33.27s

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#189 Qwen3.6 35B A3B

none
Cost
$0.008
Time
30.1s
Tokens
6,317 tok

#187 Thinking Machines: Inkling Small

none
Cost
$0.008
Time
42.1s
Tokens
6,319 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.6 35B A3B 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 8.77s 7,911 11,161 0
Inkling Small 3.6 10.0 0.0% 0 759ms 7,356 454 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair