Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Qwen3.6 35B A3B vs Inkling

Qwen3.6 35B A3B leads on average score with 5.3 vs 5.2. Qwen3.6 35B A3B has the lower benchmark cost at $0.061 vs $0.147. Inkling is faster at 3.50s vs 5.52s, with pass rates of 31.8% vs 28.8%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Rank
#175
Total Output Tokens
46,957
Response Time (avg)
5.52s
Total Cost
$0.061
Rank
#178
Total Output Tokens
10,551
Response Time (avg)
3.50s
Total Cost
$0.147
Recommended model Qwen3.6 35B A3B

It has the best score here (5.3), while costing about 2.4x less than Inkling.

Detailed comparison

Metric Qwen3.6 35B A3B Qwen3.6 35B A3B none Release: 2026-04-20 Inkling Inkling none Release: 2026-07-18
Score 5.3 5.2
Rank #175 #178
Reliability 10.0 9.9
Consistency 7.7 9.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 31.8% 28.8%
Flaky tests 6 1
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 1.496 2.448
Total Cost $0.061 $0.147
Input Price $0.140 / 1M $1.000 / 1M
Output Price $1.000 / 1M $4.050 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 93,979 104,111
Output Tokens 46,957 10,551
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 5.52s 3.50s
Response Time (max) 39.54s 48.02s
Response Time (total) 110.40s 77.09s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#175 Qwen3.6 35B A3B

none
Cost
$0.008
Time
30.1s
Tokens
6,317 tok

#178 Thinking Machines: Inkling

none
Provider returned error
Cost
$0.000
Time
5.3s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.6 35B A3B 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 8.77s 7,911 11,161 0
Inkling 4.5 10.0 0.0% 0 1.01s 7,356 436 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair