Navigate
Advertise here

Qwen3.6 35B A3B vs Inkling

Qwen3.6 35B A3B leads on average score with 5.3 vs 5.2. Qwen3.6 35B A3B has the lower benchmark cost at $0.051 vs $0.147. Inkling is faster at 3.47s vs 5.57s, with pass rates of 28.8% vs 28.8%.

Last updated at: 2026-09-08

Compared models

Rank
#256
Total Output Tokens
45,905
Response Time (avg)
5.57s
Total Cost
$0.051
Rank
#258
Total Output Tokens
10,554
Response Time (avg)
3.47s
Total Cost
$0.147
Recommended model Qwen3.6 35B A3B

It has the best score here (5.3), while costing about 2.9x less than Inkling.

Detailed comparison

Metric Qwen3.6 35B A3B Qwen3.6 35B A3B none Release: 2026-04-20 Inkling Inkling none Release: 2026-07-18
Score 5.3 5.2
Rank #256 #258
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.1 9.6
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 28.8% 28.8%
Flaky tests 5 1
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 1.470 2.448
Total Cost $0.051 $0.147
Input Price $0.100 / 1M $1.000 / 1M
Output Price $0.900 / 1M $4.050 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 93,990 104,120
Output Tokens 45,905 10,554
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 5.57s 3.47s
Response Time (max) 39.54s 48.02s
Response Time (total) 111.32s 76.28s
Parameters 35B total (3B active) 975B total (41B active)
Availability Open source Open source

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#256 Qwen3.6 35B A3B

none
Cost
$0.008
Time
30.1s
Tokens
6,317 tok

#258 Thinking Machines: Inkling

none
Provider returned error
Cost
$0.000
Time
5.3s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.6 35B A3B 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 8.77s 7,911 11,161 0
Inkling 4.5 10.0 0.0% 0 1.01s 7,356 436 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair