Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

AI BENCHY Compare

Qwen: Qwen3.6 27B vs Z.ai: GLM 5

Summary

Qwen3.6 27B vs GLM 5 benchmark comparison: GLM 5 leads on average score with 6.1 vs 5.6. Qwen3.6 27B has the lower benchmark cost at $0.025 vs $0.027. Qwen3.6 27B is faster at 3.72s vs 4.03s, with pass rates of 47.6% vs 44.4%.

Recommended model: GLM 5 - It has the strongest score in this comparison (6.1) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Last updated at: 2026-06-10

Metric Qwen3.6 27B Qwen3.6 27B none Release: 2026-04-20 GLM 5 GLM 5 none Release: 2026-02-12
Score 5.6 6.1
Rank #119 #99
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 7.6 9.7
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 47.6% 44.4%
Flaky tests 6 1
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 0.467 0.263
Total Cost $0.025 $0.027
Input Price $0.290 / 1M $0.600 / 1M
Output Price $2.400 / 1M $1.920 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 52,721 37,135
Output Tokens 3,812 1,989
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 3.72s 4.03s
Response Time (max) 11.82s 11.07s
Response Time (total) 78.08s 56.37s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#119 Qwen3.6 27B

none
Cost
$0.009
Time
83.0s
Tokens
4,549 tok

#99 GLM 5

none
Cost
$0.007
Time
32.1s
Tokens
2,023 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Anti-AI Tricks Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.6 27B 3.8 3.7 41.7% 3 2.83s 696 490 0
GLM 5 4.8 10.0 25.0% 0 2.37s 510 275 0
Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.6 27B 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 4.16s 7,913 539 0
GLM 5 4.0 7.8 11.1% 1 5.12s 7,256 428 0
Combined Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.6 27B 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 9.95s 22,497 1,401 0
GLM 5 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 4.98s 12,812 406 0
Data parsing and extraction Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.6 27B 7.3 5.8 83.3% 1 2.06s 7,788 248 0
GLM 5 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 5.78s 7,107 203 0
Domain specific Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.6 27B 7.7 10.0 66.7% 0 3.03s 789 24 0
GLM 5 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 2.24s 643 19 0
General Intelligence Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.6 27B 5.2 9.9 0.0% 0 1.07s 522 72 0
GLM 5 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 3.27s 477 103 0
Instructions following Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.6 27B 6.2 5.8 66.7% 1 1.92s 711 49 0
GLM 5 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 1.48s 636 61 0
Puzzle Solving Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.6 27B 5.3 7.2 44.4% 1 5.15s 714 639 0
GLM 5 7.7 10.0 66.7% 0 1.91s 609 261 0
Tool Calling Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.6 27B 9.5 10.0 100.0% 0 6.74s 10,881 339 0
GLM 5 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 11.07s 6,899 220 0
Trivia Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.6 27B 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 4.03s 210 11 0
GLM 5 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 3.62s 186 13 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair