Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 vs Z.ai: GLM 5

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 leads on average score with 6.1 vs 5.7. GLM 5 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.041 vs $0.122. GLM 5 is faster at 4.03s vs 13.56s, with pass rates of 43.9% vs 42.4%.

Recommended modelGLM 5Its score stays close to the best score here (5.7 vs 6.1), while costing about 3.0x less than Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Metric Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 none Release: 2026-04-20 GLM 5 GLM 5 none Release: 2026-02-12
Score 6.1 5.7
Rank #137 #152
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.7 9.3
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 43.9% 42.4%
Flaky tests 4 1
Total Runs 66 63
Cost per result 1.636 0.263
Total Cost $0.122 $0.041
Input Price $0.300 / 1M $0.950 / 1M
Output Price $1.800 / 1M $2.551 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 94,468 37,135
Output Tokens 51,487 1,989
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 13.56s 4.03s
Response Time (max) 206.05s 11.07s
Response Time (total) 298.31s 56.37s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#137 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20

none
Cost
$0.008
Time
77.0s
Tokens
4,369 tok

#152 GLM 5

none
Cost
$0.007
Time
32.1s
Tokens
2,023 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 3.9 7.8 11.1% 1 1.69s 7,913 480 0
GLM 5 4.0 7.8 11.1% 1 5.12s 7,256 428 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair