Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 vs Qwen3.7 Flash

The average score is effectively tied at 6.1 vs 6.1. Qwen3.7 Flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.019 vs $0.122. Qwen3.7 Flash is faster at 10.06s vs 13.56s, with pass rates of 43.9% vs 36.4%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-28

Rank
#141
Total Output Tokens
51,487
Response Time (avg)
13.56s
Total Cost
$0.122
Rank
#136
Total Output Tokens
90,507
Response Time (avg)
10.06s
Total Cost
$0.019
Recommended model Qwen3.7 Flash

It has the best score here (6.1), while costing about 6.6x less than Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20.

Detailed comparison

Metric Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 none Release: 2026-04-20 Qwen3.7 Flash Qwen3.7 Flash none Release: 2026-07-28
Score 6.1 6.1
Rank #141 #136
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.7 9.2
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 43.9% 36.4%
Flaky tests 4 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 1.636 0.262
Total Cost $0.122 $0.019
Input Price $0.300 / 1M $0.030 / 1M
Output Price $1.800 / 1M $0.130 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 94,468 218,731
Output Tokens 51,487 90,507
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 13.56s 10.06s
Response Time (max) 206.05s 186.24s
Response Time (total) 298.31s 221.34s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#141 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20

none
Cost
$0.008
Time
77.0s
Tokens
4,369 tok

#136 Qwen3.7 Flash

none
Cost
$0.001
Time
34.0s
Tokens
4,814 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 3.9 7.8 11.1% 1 1.69s 7,913 480 0
Qwen3.7 Flash 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 1.55s 7,911 855 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair