Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 (medium) vs GLM 5.1 (medium)

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 (medium) leads on average score with 7.2 vs 7.1. Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.317 vs $0.535. Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 (medium) is faster at 46.36s vs 46.77s, with pass rates of 63.6% vs 69.7%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Rank
#78
Total Output Tokens
168,893
Response Time (avg)
46.36s
Total Cost
$0.317
Rank
#82
Total Output Tokens
152,552
Response Time (avg)
46.77s
Total Cost
$0.535
Recommended model Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 (medium)

It has the best score here (7.2), while costing about 1.7x less than GLM 5.1 (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 medium Release: 2026-04-20 GLM 5.1 GLM 5.1 medium Release: 2026-04-07
Score 7.2 7.1
Rank #78 #82
Reliability 9.6 8.3
Consistency 9.0 8.4
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 63.6% 69.7%
Flaky tests 2 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 3.023 4.202
Total Cost $0.317 $0.535
Input Price $0.300 / 1M $0.966 / 1M
Output Price $1.800 / 1M $3.036 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 42,097 82,623
Output Tokens 2,280 16,089
Reasoning Tokens 166,613 136,463
Response Time (avg) 46.36s 46.77s
Response Time (max) 189.38s 308.75s
Response Time (total) 973.57s 982.16s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#78 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20

medium
Cost
$0.008
Time
76.7s
Tokens
4,355 tok

#82 GLM 5.1

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 6.2 8.7 33.3% 0 125.25s 7,630 308 58,682
GLM 5.1 4.6 3.7 44.5% 2 109.63s 5,702 4,871 37,826

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair