Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

AI BENCHY Compare

Qwen: Qwen3.5-9B vs Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5-Pro

Summary

Qwen3.5-9B vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro benchmark comparison: MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads on average score with 5.5 vs 4.6. Qwen3.5-9B has the lower benchmark cost at $0.006 vs $0.017. MiMo-V2.5-Pro is faster at 1.78s vs 1.89s, with pass rates of 20.6% vs 39.7%.

Recommended model: Qwen3.5-9B - It offers the best overall trade-off: a competitive score (4.6), lower cost than MiMo-V2.5-Pro, and balanced response time.

Last updated at: 2026-06-10

Metric Qwen3.5-9B Qwen3.5-9B none Release: 2026-03-02 MiMo-V2.5-Pro MiMo-V2.5-Pro none Release: 2026-04-22
Score 4.6 5.5
Rank #155 #124
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.7 8.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 20.6% 39.7%
Flaky tests 1 4
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 0.123 0.648
Total Cost $0.006 $0.017
Input Price $0.100 / 1M $0.435 / 1M
Output Price $0.150 / 1M $0.870 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 48,041 30,724
Output Tokens 3,952 3,043
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 1.89s 1.78s
Response Time (max) 6.03s 8.32s
Response Time (total) 39.68s 37.42s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#155 Qwen3.5-9B

none
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#124 MiMo-V2.5-Pro

none
Cost
$0.004
Time
46.4s
Tokens
4,025 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Anti-AI Tricks Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-9B 3.1 9.9 0.0% 0 1.71s 696 582 0
MiMo-V2.5-Pro 3.3 8.1 8.3% 1 2.67s 645 994 0
Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-9B 3.9 7.8 11.1% 1 5.60s 7,913 1,042 0
MiMo-V2.5-Pro 4.3 7.8 22.2% 1 1.41s 6,559 485 0
Combined Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-9B 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 5.91s 20,397 1,255 0
MiMo-V2.5-Pro 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 3.54s 4,695 596 0
Data parsing and extraction Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-9B 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 847ms 7,788 249 0
MiMo-V2.5-Pro 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 1.32s 7,758 249 0
Domain specific Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-9B 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 464ms 789 24 0
MiMo-V2.5-Pro 5.3 10.0 33.3% 0 877ms 753 27 0
General Intelligence Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-9B 4.4 9.9 0.0% 0 552ms 522 99 0
MiMo-V2.5-Pro 4.0 10.0 0.0% 0 2.58s 498 87 0
Instructions following Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-9B 6.5 10.0 50.0% 0 514ms 711 75 0
MiMo-V2.5-Pro 6.4 10.0 50.0% 0 1.03s 684 66 0
Puzzle Solving Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-9B 3.2 10.0 0.0% 0 621ms 714 347 0
MiMo-V2.5-Pro 6.7 4.7 77.8% 2 1.30s 678 267 0
Tool Calling Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-9B 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 1.27s 8,301 273 0
MiMo-V2.5-Pro 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 3.30s 8,238 258 0
Trivia Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-9B 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 2.32s 210 6 0
MiMo-V2.5-Pro 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 1.89s 216 14 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair