Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Qwen: Qwen3.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20

Qwen3.5-35B-A3B (medium) leads on average score with 6.2 vs 6.1. Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.122 vs $0.837. Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 is faster at 13.56s vs 112.47s, with pass rates of 66.7% vs 43.9%.

Recommended modelQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Its score stays close to the best score here (6.1 vs 6.2), while costing about 6.9x less than Qwen3.5-35B-A3B (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Metric Qwen3.5-35B-A3B Qwen3.5-35B-A3B medium Release: 2026-02-24 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 none Release: 2026-04-20
Score 6.2 6.1
Rank #130 #137
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 7.6 8.7
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 66.7% 43.9%
Flaky tests 6 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 9.130 1.636
Total Cost $0.837 $0.122
Input Price $0.140 / 1M $0.300 / 1M
Output Price $1.000 / 1M $1.800 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 130,388 94,468
Output Tokens 40,630 51,487
Reasoning Tokens 786,040 0
Response Time (avg) 112.47s 13.56s
Response Time (max) 950.25s 206.05s
Response Time (total) 2474.28s 298.31s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#130 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B

medium
Cost
$0.009
Time
71.4s
Tokens
8,631 tok

#137 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20

none
Cost
$0.008
Time
77.0s
Tokens
4,369 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 5.9 9.3 33.3% 0 206.65s 4,106 23,844 111,462
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 3.9 7.8 11.1% 1 1.69s 7,913 480 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair