Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Qwen3.5-27B (medium) vs Grok 4.6 (low)

Qwen3.5-27B (medium) leads on average score with 7.4 vs 7.4. Grok 4.6 (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.441 vs $0.981. Grok 4.6 (low) is faster at 14.20s vs 111.94s, with pass rates of 72.7% vs 71.2%.

Last updated at: 2026-08-12

Rank
#86
Total Output Tokens
614,429
Response Time (avg)
111.94s
Total Cost
$0.981
Rank
#90
Total Output Tokens
36,792
Response Time (avg)
14.20s
Total Cost
$0.441
Recommended model Grok 4.6 (low)

Its score stays close to the best score here (7.4 vs 7.4), while costing about 2.2x less than Qwen3.5-27B (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Qwen3.5-27B Qwen3.5-27B medium Release: 2026-02-24 Grok 4.6 Grok 4.6 low Release: 2026-08-12
Score 7.4 7.4
Rank #86 #90
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.2 9.2
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 72.7% 71.2%
Flaky tests 5 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 8.324 2.938
Total Cost $0.981 $0.441
Input Price $0.195 / 1M $2.000 / 1M
Output Price $1.560 / 1M $6.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 111,635 109,951
Output Tokens 15,999 5,124
Reasoning Tokens 598,430 31,668
Response Time (avg) 111.94s 14.20s
Response Time (max) 1026.43s 26.46s
Response Time (total) 2462.67s 312.33s
Parameters 27B ~1.7T total (~170B active)
Availability Open source Closed

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#86 Qwen3.5-27B

medium
Cost
$0.008
Time
62.0s
Tokens
3,099 tok

#90 SpaceXAI: Grok 4.6

low
Cost
$0.011
Time
26.0s
Tokens
1,941 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-27B 6.2 7.1 55.6% 1 160.69s 7,895 6,381 89,388
Grok 4.6 5.5 7.1 44.4% 1 21.69s 9,579 349 7,740

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair