Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Qwen: Qwen3.5-27B vs Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15

The average score is effectively tied at 7.4 vs 7.5. Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.437 vs $0.981. Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 (medium) is faster at 89.19s vs 111.94s, with pass rates of 72.7% vs 71.2%.

Recommended modelQwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 (medium)It has the best score here (7.5), while costing about 2.2x less than Qwen3.5-27B (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Metric Qwen3.5-27B Qwen3.5-27B medium Release: 2026-02-24 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 medium Release: 2026-02-15
Score 7.4 7.5
Rank #66 #65
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.2 8.5
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 72.7% 71.2%
Flaky tests 5 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 8.324 3.348
Total Cost $0.981 $0.437
Input Price $0.195 / 1M $0.260 / 1M
Output Price $1.560 / 1M $1.560 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 111,635 113,560
Output Tokens 15,999 9,823
Reasoning Tokens 598,430 250,881
Response Time (avg) 111.94s 89.19s
Response Time (max) 1026.43s 304.85s
Response Time (total) 2462.67s 1337.92s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#66 Qwen3.5-27B

medium
Cost
$0.008
Time
62.0s
Tokens
3,099 tok

#65 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15

medium
Cost
$0.011
Time
125.5s
Tokens
7,040 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-27B 6.2 7.1 55.6% 1 160.69s 7,895 6,381 89,388
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 6.6 7.1 44.4% 1 180.70s 6,950 420 80,595

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair