Navigate
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

GPT-6 Luna vs Qwen3.6 27B

GPT-6 Luna leads on average score with 5.6 vs 5.5. GPT-6 Luna has the lower benchmark cost at $0.012 vs $0.075. Qwen3.6 27B is faster at 10.62s vs 19.08s, with pass rates of 42.4% vs 45.5%.

Last updated at: 2026-09-23

Compared models

Rank
#260
Total Output Tokens
5,508
Response Time (avg)
19.08s
Total Cost
$0.012
Rank
#267
Total Output Tokens
16,156
Response Time (avg)
10.62s
Total Cost
$0.075
Recommended model GPT-6 Luna

It has the best score here (5.6), while costing about 6.5x less than Qwen3.6 27B.

Detailed comparison

Metric GPT-6 Luna GPT-6 Luna none Release: 2026-09-23 Qwen3.6 27B Qwen3.6 27B none Release: 2026-04-20
Score 5.6 5.5
Rank #260 #267
Reliability 9.9 10.0
Consistency 8.1 7.6
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 42.4% 45.5%
Flaky tests 5 6
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.164 1.220
Total Cost $0.012 $0.075
Input Price $0.100 / 1M $0.320 / 1M
Output Price $0.500 / 1M $2.700 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 87,216 95,805
Output Tokens 5,508 16,156
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 19.08s 10.62s
Response Time (max) 98.62s 156.31s
Response Time (total) 419.83s 233.68s
Parameters ~400B total (~17B active) 27B
Availability Closed Open source

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#260 GPT-6 Luna

none
Cost
$0.002
Time
26.0s
Tokens
3,235 tok

#267 Qwen3.6 27B

none
Cost
$0.009
Time
83.0s
Tokens
4,549 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
GPT-6 Luna 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 8.04s 7,302 376 0
Qwen3.6 27B 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 4.16s 7,913 539 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair