Navigate
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

GPT-6.1 Terra vs Qwen3.8 27B (high)

Qwen3.8 27B (high) leads on average score with 8.7 vs 8.6. GPT-6.1 Terra has the lower benchmark cost at $0.184 vs ~$0.298. GPT-6.1 Terra is faster at 4.08s vs 166.34s, with pass rates of 84.1% vs 78.3%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-26

Compared models

Rank
#79
Total Output Tokens
4,906
Response Time (avg)
4.08s
Total Cost
$0.184
Rank
#74
Total Output Tokens
677,080
Response Time (avg)
166.34s
Total Cost
~$0.298
Recommended model GPT-6.1 Terra

Its score stays close to the best score here (8.6 vs 8.7), while costing about 1.6x less than Qwen3.8 27B (high).

Detailed comparison

Metric GPT-6.1 Terra GPT-6.1 Terra none Release: 2026-10-26 Qwen3.8 27B Qwen3.8 27B high Release: 2026-08-14 Free Available
Score 8.6 8.7
Rank #79 #74
Reliability 10.0 9.7
Consistency 9.3 9.2
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 84.1% 78.3%
Flaky tests 2 2
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 1.021 ~1.751
Total Cost $0.184 ~$0.298
Input Price $1.000 / 1M N/A
Output Price $5.000 / 1M N/A
Cache Read Price $0.050 / 1M N/A
Cache Write Price $1.250 / 1M N/A
Total Input Tokens 159,129 348,967
Output Tokens 4,906 1,005
Reasoning Tokens 0 676,075
Response Time (avg) 4.08s 166.34s
Response Time (max) 40.32s 640.85s
Response Time (total) 93.75s 3825.81s
Parameters ~1T total (~60B active) 27.3B
Availability Closed Weights available

Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#79 GPT-6.1 Terra

none
Cost
$0.017
Time
36.8s
Tokens
3,297 tok

#74 Qwen3.8 27B

high
Cost
~$0.008
Time
270.1s
Tokens
18,963 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
GPT-6.1 Terra 8.2 7.2 88.9% 1 1.86s 7,302 387 0
Qwen3.8 27B 8.1 7.0 88.9% 1 248.62s 8,235 346 143,335

Switch Comparison Pair

Muse Spark 1.1lowvsGPT-6.1 TerranoneGPT-5.2mediumvsQwen3.8 27BhighFree AvailableQwen3.8 27BhighFree AvailablevsMiMo-V2.6-PromediumClaude Sonnet 5.5highvsGPT-6.1 TerranoneSeed 2.1 TurbomediumvsQwen3.8 27BhighFree AvailableGPT-6 SollowvsQwen3.8 27BhighFree AvailableDeepSeek V4.1 FlashmaxvsGPT-6.1 TerranoneClaude Haiku 5.5lowvsGPT-6.1 TerranoneGPT-6.1 TerranonevsQwen3.8 Max (0902)lowDeepSeek V4.1 FlashmaxvsQwen3.8 27BhighFree AvailableMuse Spark 1.2lowvsQwen3.8 27BhighFree AvailableKimi K3.1 PromaxvsQwen3.8 27BhighFree Available