- Rank
- #260
- Total Output Tokens
- 307,921
- Response Time (avg)
- 56.55s
- Total Cost
- $0.159
GPT-5 Nano (medium) vs Space Bunny Alpha (high)
Space Bunny Alpha (high) leads on average score with 7.5 vs 5.7. Space Bunny Alpha (high) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.000 vs $0.159. Space Bunny Alpha (high) is faster at 29.38s vs 56.55s, with pass rates of 53.6% vs 63.8%.
Compared models
- Rank
- #120
- Total Output Tokens
- 181,271
- Response Time (avg)
- 29.38s
- Total Cost
- $0.000
Recommended model
Space Bunny Alpha (high)
It has the best score here (7.5), while responding about 1.9x faster than GPT-5 Nano (medium).
Detailed comparison
| Metric | GPT-5 Nano GPT-5 Nano medium | Space Bunny Alpha Space Bunny Alpha high |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 5.7 | 7.5 |
| Rank | #260 | #120 |
| Reliability | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Consistency | 6.5 | 8.5 |
| Attempts | 69/69 | 69/69 |
| Tests Correct | ||
| Attempt pass rate | 53.6% | 63.8% |
| Flaky tests | 10 | 4 |
| Total Runs | 69 | 69 |
| Cost per result | 1.737 | 0.000 |
| Total Cost | $0.159 | $0.000 |
| Input Price | $0.050 / 1M | $0.000 / 1M |
| Output Price | $0.400 / 1M | $0.000 / 1M |
| Cache Read Price | $0.005 / 1M | N/A |
| Cache Write Price | N/A | N/A |
| Total Input Tokens | 314,436 | 302,228 |
| Output Tokens | 13,578 | 181,271 |
| Reasoning Tokens | 294,343 | 0 |
| Response Time (avg) | 56.55s | 29.38s |
| Response Time (max) | 227.89s | 234.56s |
| Response Time (total) | 961.32s | 675.79s |
| Parameters | ~120B total (~5B active) | - |
| Availability | Closed | Closed |
Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.
Model generation showcase
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#260 GPT-5 Nano
medium- Cost
- $0.006
- Time
- 108.5s
- Tokens
- 13,209 tok
#120 Space Bunny Alpha
high- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 76.4s
- Tokens
- 8,935 tok
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Category Breakdown
| Agentic | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-5 Nano | 4.7 | 3.1 | 33.3% | 1 | 94.09s | 219,492 | 1,541 | 23,943 | |
| Space Bunny Alpha | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 73.43s | 164,819 | 11,116 | 0 |
| Anti-AI Tricks | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-5 Nano | 6.5 | 7.9 | 58.3% | 1 | 25.50s | 606 | 1,221 | 21,184 | |
| Space Bunny Alpha | 6.4 | 5.8 | 66.7% | 2 | 3.48s | 2,130 | 3,125 | 0 |
| Coding | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-5 Nano | 7.0 | 7.7 | 55.6% | 1 | 41.62s | 7,305 | 740 | 41,152 | |
| Space Bunny Alpha | 6.2 | 7.1 | 55.6% | 1 | 8.29s | 8,493 | 8,006 | 0 |
| Combined | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-5 Nano | 6.4 | 5.8 | 66.7% | 1 | 146.93s | 71,846 | 7,156 | 86,976 | |
| Space Bunny Alpha | 6.5 | 10.0 | 50.0% | 0 | 19.30s | 103,428 | 15,087 | 0 |
| Data parsing and extraction | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-5 Nano | 3.7 | 1.7 | 50.0% | 2 | 21.42s | 7,140 | 453 | 10,560 | |
| Space Bunny Alpha | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 1.91s | 7,890 | 590 | 0 |
| Domain specific | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-5 Nano | 3.4 | 1.6 | 44.4% | 3 | 124.13s | 628 | 232 | 73,792 | |
| Space Bunny Alpha | 7.7 | 10.0 | 66.7% | 0 | 85.05s | 1,869 | 66,726 | 0 |
| General Intelligence | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-5 Nano | 4.1 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 17.51s | 477 | 202 | 4,608 | |
| Space Bunny Alpha | 4.2 | 9.9 | 0.0% | 0 | 4.75s | 855 | 1,038 | 0 |
| Instructions following | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-5 Nano | 9.8 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 15.64s | 660 | 312 | 4,736 | |
| Space Bunny Alpha | 6.2 | 5.8 | 66.7% | 1 | 2.04s | 1,425 | 719 | 0 |
| Puzzle Solving | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-5 Nano | 5.3 | 7.2 | 44.4% | 1 | 20.63s | 642 | 929 | 14,272 | |
| Space Bunny Alpha | 8.3 | 10.0 | 66.7% | 0 | 6.43s | 1,782 | 5,175 | 0 |
| Tool Calling | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-5 Nano | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 33.30s | 5,445 | 558 | 6,976 | |
| Space Bunny Alpha | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 3.34s | 8,961 | 471 | 0 |
| Trivia | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-5 Nano | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 20.13s | 195 | 234 | 6,144 | |
| Space Bunny Alpha | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 234.56s | 576 | 69,218 | 0 |
Quick Compare
Switch Comparison Pair
Space Bunny AlphahighvsGLM 5.1mediumTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsGPT-5 NanomediumSeed 2.1 TurbononevsGPT-5 NanomediumQwen3.8 27BlowFree AvailablevsSpace Bunny AlphahighGPT-6 LunalowvsSpace Bunny AlphahighSeed-2.0-MinimediumvsSpace Bunny AlphahighLing 3.0 FlashhighvsGPT-5 NanomediumDeepSeek V4.1 FlashnonevsGPT-5 NanomediumGemma 4 31BnoneFree AvailablevsGPT-5 NanomediumGPT-5 NanomediumvsSpace Bunny AlphalowGPT-5 NanomediumvsSolar Pro 4noneGPT-5 NanomediumvsQwen3.7 Flashnone