Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

AI BENCHY Compare

OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Summary

GPT-5.6 Luna (low) leads on average score with 6.2 vs 5.3. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has the lower benchmark cost at $0.020 vs $0.141. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is faster at 3.41s vs 4.35s, with pass rates of 57.1% vs 31.8%.

Recommended modelQwen3.5-122B-A10BIt offers the best overall trade-off: a competitive score (5.3), lower cost than GPT-5.6 Luna (low), and balanced response time.

Last updated at: 2026-07-16

Metric GPT-5.6 Luna GPT-5.6 Luna low Release: 2026-07-09 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B Qwen3.5-122B-A10B none Release: 2026-02-24
Score 6.2 5.3
Rank #114 #153
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.5 9.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 57.1% 31.8%
Flaky tests 4 1
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 1.404 0.393
Total Cost $0.141 $0.020
Input Price $1.000 / 1M $0.260 / 1M
Output Price $6.000 / 1M $2.080 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 34,218 47,735
Output Tokens 2,110 3,383
Reasoning Tokens 15,571 0
Response Time (avg) 4.35s 3.41s
Response Time (max) 18.06s 46.00s
Response Time (total) 91.45s 71.59s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#114 GPT-5.6 Luna

low
Cost
$0.011
Time
10.2s
Tokens
1,897 tok

#153 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

none
Cost
$0.016
Time
44.5s
Tokens
6,431 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
GPT-5.6 Luna 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 4.61s 7,302 557 3,535
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 3.7 7.0 22.2% 1 2.77s 7,913 693 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair