Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

OpenAI: GPT-5.5 vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 Flash

GPT-5.5 leads on average score with 6.9 vs 6.1. Qwen3.6 Flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.062 vs $0.544. GPT-5.5 is faster at 2.36s vs 3.74s, with pass rates of 56.1% vs 34.9%.

Recommended modelGPT-5.5It has the best score here (6.9), while responding about 1.6x faster than Qwen3.6 Flash.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Metric GPT-5.5 GPT-5.5 none Release: 2026-04-24 Qwen3.6 Flash Qwen3.6 Flash none Release: 2026-04-20
Score 6.9 6.1
Rank #95 #135
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.9 9.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 56.1% 34.9%
Flaky tests 3 1
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 4.945 0.935
Total Cost $0.544 $0.062
Input Price $5.000 / 1M $0.188 / 1M
Output Price $30.000 / 1M $1.125 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 79,285 139,788
Output Tokens 4,915 30,947
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 2.36s 3.74s
Response Time (max) 12.24s 48.79s
Response Time (total) 51.88s 82.38s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#95 GPT-5.5

none
Cost
$0.090
Time
54.3s
Tokens
3,063 tok

#135 Qwen3.6 Flash

none
Cost
$0.005
Time
20.1s
Tokens
4,211 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
GPT-5.5 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 1.35s 7,305 462 0
Qwen3.6 Flash 5.4 10.0 33.3% 0 1.79s 6,488 889 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair