Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

AI BENCHY Compare

OpenAI: GPT-5.4 vs StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash

Summary

The average score is effectively tied at 8.5 vs 8.5. Step 3.7 Flash (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.376 vs $1.210. Step 3.7 Flash (medium) is faster at 20.35s vs 22.35s, with pass rates of 76.2% vs 73.0%.

Recommended modelStep 3.7 Flash (medium)It has the best score here (8.5), while costing about 3.2x less than GPT-5.4 (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-14

Metric GPT-5.4 GPT-5.4 medium Release: 2026-03-05 Step 3.7 Flash Step 3.7 Flash medium Release: 2026-05-29
Score 8.5 8.5
Rank #20 #23
Reliability 10.0 9.9
Consistency 8.6 9.3
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 76.2% 73.0%
Flaky tests 4 2
Total Runs 63 61
Cost per result 8.640 2.686
Total Cost $1.210 $0.376
Input Price $2.500 / 1M $0.200 / 1M
Output Price $15.000 / 1M $1.150 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 34,108 39,981
Output Tokens 2,242 319,958
Reasoning Tokens 72,707 0
Response Time (avg) 22.35s 20.35s
Response Time (max) 100.41s 113.98s
Response Time (total) 469.29s 427.42s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#20 GPT-5.4

medium
Cost
$0.214
Time
199.6s
Tokens
14,349 tok

#23 Step 3.7 Flash

medium
Cost
$0.006
Time
46.2s
Tokens
4,466 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
GPT-5.4 8.8 7.8 88.9% 1 44.36s 7,305 433 24,216
Step 3.7 Flash 8.8 7.8 88.9% 1 27.42s 7,437 44,797 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair