Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

AI BENCHY Compare

OpenAI: GPT-5.4 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.2

Summary

GPT-5.4 (medium) leads on average score with 8.5 vs 8.0. GLM 5.2 (high) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.667 vs $1.210. GPT-5.4 (medium) is faster at 22.35s vs 37.09s, with pass rates of 76.2% vs 77.8%.

Recommended modelGPT-5.4 (medium)It has the best score here (8.5), while responding about 1.7x faster than GLM 5.2 (high).

Last updated at: 2026-07-14

Metric GPT-5.4 GPT-5.4 medium Release: 2026-03-05 GLM 5.2 GLM 5.2 high Release: 2026-06-17
Score 8.5 8.0
Rank #20 #32
Reliability 10.0 9.3
Consistency 8.6 7.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 76.2% 77.8%
Flaky tests 4 6
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 8.640 4.255
Total Cost $1.210 $0.667
Input Price $2.500 / 1M $0.929 / 1M
Output Price $15.000 / 1M $2.918 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 34,108 34,993
Output Tokens 2,242 51,575
Reasoning Tokens 72,707 166,065
Response Time (avg) 22.35s 37.09s
Response Time (max) 100.41s 180.69s
Response Time (total) 469.29s 778.91s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#20 GPT-5.4

medium
Cost
$0.214
Time
199.6s
Tokens
14,349 tok

#32 GLM 5.2

high
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
GPT-5.4 8.8 7.8 88.9% 1 44.36s 7,305 433 24,216
GLM 5.2 6.4 4.4 77.8% 2 73.03s 5,124 2,302 22,546

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair