Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

GPT-5.2 Chat vs Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 (medium)

GPT-5.2 Chat leads on average score with 8.0 vs 7.5. Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.437 vs $0.604. GPT-5.2 Chat is faster at 7.65s vs 89.19s, with pass rates of 74.2% vs 71.2%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Rank
#37
Total Output Tokens
30,424
Response Time (avg)
7.65s
Total Cost
$0.604
Rank
#65
Total Output Tokens
260,704
Response Time (avg)
89.19s
Total Cost
$0.437
Recommended model GPT-5.2 Chat

It has the best score here (8.0), while responding about 11.7x faster than Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric GPT-5.2 Chat GPT-5.2 Chat none Release: 2025-12-11 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 medium Release: 2026-02-15
Score 8.0 7.5
Rank #37 #65
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.6 8.5
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 74.2% 71.2%
Flaky tests 4 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 4.308 3.348
Total Cost $0.604 $0.437
Input Price $1.750 / 1M $0.260 / 1M
Output Price $14.000 / 1M $1.560 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 101,248 113,560
Output Tokens 30,424 9,823
Reasoning Tokens 0 250,881
Response Time (avg) 7.65s 89.19s
Response Time (max) 38.52s 304.85s
Response Time (total) 168.39s 1337.92s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#37 GPT-5.2 Chat

none
Cost
$0.010
Time
15.3s
Tokens
797 tok

#65 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15

medium
Cost
$0.011
Time
125.5s
Tokens
7,040 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
GPT-5.2 Chat 8.8 7.8 88.9% 1 9.82s 7,305 6,731 0
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 6.6 7.1 44.4% 1 180.70s 6,950 420 80,595

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair