Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Kimi K3 (max) vs Qwen3.8 27B (medium)

Kimi K3 (max) leads on average score with 7.9 vs 7.8. Local hardware cost was not measured, so cost comparisons are unavailable. Qwen3.8 27B (medium) is faster at 33.05s vs 142.84s, with pass rates of 77.3% vs 66.7%.

Last updated at: 2026-08-15

Rank
#58
Total Output Tokens
224,128
Response Time (avg)
142.84s
Total Cost
$3.467
Rank
#68
Total Output Tokens
136,162
Response Time (avg)
33.05s
Total Cost
N/A
Recommended model Kimi K3 (max)

It has the strongest score in this comparison (7.9) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Detailed comparison

Metric Kimi K3 Kimi K3 max Release: 2026-07-16 Qwen3.8 27B Qwen3.8 27B medium Release: 2026-08-14
Score 7.9 7.8
Rank #58 #68
Reliability 9.0 9.6
Consistency 9.2 9.7
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 77.3% 66.7%
Flaky tests 2 1
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 21.668 N/A
Total Cost $3.467 N/A
Input Price $3.000 / 1M N/A
Output Price $15.000 / 1M N/A
Total Input Tokens 34,960 98,266
Output Tokens 2,887 1,861
Reasoning Tokens 221,241 134,301
Response Time (avg) 142.84s 33.05s
Response Time (max) 766.58s 214.63s
Response Time (total) 2714.02s 694.04s
Parameters 2.8T total (104B active) 27.3B
Availability Weights available Weights available

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#58 MoonshotAI: Kimi K3

max
Cost
$0.281
Time
506.9s
Tokens
18,863 tok

#68 Qwen3.8 27B

medium
Cost
N/A
Time
43.4s
Tokens
2,956 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Kimi K3 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 325.79s 8,061 460 84,012
Qwen3.8 27B 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 40.50s 7,893 585 26,808

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair