Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

AI BENCHY Compare

MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 Max Preview

Summary

Qwen3.6 Max Preview (medium) leads on average score with 8.9 vs 8.5. Qwen3.6 Max Preview (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.960 vs $3.112. Qwen3.6 Max Preview (medium) is faster at 59.63s vs 122.48s, with pass rates of 82.5% vs 81.0%.

Recommended modelQwen3.6 Max Preview (medium)It has the best score here (8.9), while costing about 3.2x less than Kimi K3 (max).

Last updated at: 2026-07-16

Metric Kimi K3 Kimi K3 max Release: 2026-07-16 Qwen3.6 Max Preview Qwen3.6 Max Preview medium Release: 2026-04-20
Score 8.5 8.9
Rank #21 #14
Reliability 9.4 10.0
Consistency 9.2 9.3
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 82.5% 81.0%
Flaky tests 2 2
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 19.446 7.024
Total Cost $3.112 $0.960
Input Price $3.000 / 1M $1.040 / 1M
Output Price $15.000 / 1M $6.240 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 34,916 42,362
Output Tokens 2,910 2,273
Reasoning Tokens 197,529 144,367
Response Time (avg) 122.48s 59.63s
Response Time (max) 766.58s 238.07s
Response Time (total) 2327.06s 1252.17s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#21 MoonshotAI: Kimi K3

max
Cost
$0.281
Time
506.9s
Tokens
18,863 tok

#14 Qwen3.6 Max Preview

medium
Cost
$0.024
Time
76.5s
Tokens
3,861 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Kimi K3 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 325.79s 8,061 460 84,012
Qwen3.6 Max Preview 8.8 7.8 88.9% 1 146.48s 7,895 427 52,957

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair