Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

AI BENCHY Compare

ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Lite vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K3

Summary

Kimi K3 (max) leads on average score with 8.5 vs 8.5. Seed-2.0-Lite (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.175 vs $3.112. Seed-2.0-Lite (medium) is faster at 47.07s vs 122.48s, with pass rates of 76.2% vs 82.5%.

Recommended modelSeed-2.0-Lite (medium)Its score stays close to the best score here (8.5 vs 8.5), while costing about 17.8x less than Kimi K3 (max).

Last updated at: 2026-07-16

Metric Seed-2.0-Lite Seed-2.0-Lite medium Release: 2026-02-14 Kimi K3 Kimi K3 max Release: 2026-07-16
Score 8.5 8.5
Rank #24 #21
Reliability 10.0 9.4
Consistency 9.0 9.2
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 76.2% 82.5%
Flaky tests 3 2
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 1.250 19.446
Total Cost $0.175 $3.112
Input Price $0.250 / 1M $3.000 / 1M
Output Price $2.000 / 1M $15.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 46,740 34,916
Output Tokens 3,230 2,910
Reasoning Tokens 78,406 197,529
Response Time (avg) 47.07s 122.48s
Response Time (max) 254.92s 766.58s
Response Time (total) 988.37s 2327.06s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#24 Seed-2.0-Lite

medium
Cost
$0.005
Time
86.7s
Tokens
2,354 tok

#21 MoonshotAI: Kimi K3

max
Cost
$0.281
Time
506.9s
Tokens
18,863 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Seed-2.0-Lite 8.0 9.8 66.7% 0 156.74s 8,247 458 31,890
Kimi K3 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 325.79s 8,061 460 84,012

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair