#138 MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6
none- Cost
- $0.020
- Time
- 127.4s
- Tokens
- 4,429 tok
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 vs Thinking Machines: Inkling
Inkling (low) leads on average score with 6.1 vs 5.8. Kimi K2.6 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.184 vs $0.187. Inkling (low) is faster at 5.15s vs 19.58s, with pass rates of 34.9% vs 54.6%.
Recommended modelInkling (low)It has the best score here (6.1), while responding about 3.8x faster than Kimi K2.6.
Last updated at: 2026-07-20
| Metric | Kimi K2.6 Kimi K2.6 none | Inkling Inkling low |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 5.8 | 6.1 |
| Rank | #138 | #123 |
| Reliability | 10.0 | 9.9 |
| Consistency | 9.3 | 8.6 |
| Tests Correct | ||
| Attempt pass rate | 34.9% | 54.6% |
| Flaky tests | 2 | 4 |
| Total Runs | 66 | 66 |
| Cost per result | 3.199 | 1.866 |
| Total Cost | $0.184 | $0.187 |
| Input Price | $0.684 / 1M | $1.000 / 1M |
| Output Price | $3.420 / 1M | $4.050 / 1M |
| Total Input Tokens | 116,970 | 109,884 |
| Output Tokens | 30,253 | 8,579 |
| Reasoning Tokens | 0 | 10,343 |
| Response Time (avg) | 19.58s | 5.15s |
| Response Time (max) | 238.89s | 41.58s |
| Response Time (total) | 430.85s | 113.39s |
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#123 Thinking Machines: Inkling
low- Cost
- $0.002
- Time
- 6.1s
- Tokens
- 502 tok
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Category Breakdown
Quick Compare
Switch Comparison Pair
Gemini 3.1 Flash LitenonevsInklinglowgpt-oss-120bmediumvsInklinglowQwen3.6 FlashnonevsInklinglowQwen3.5-FlashnonevsInklinglowQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20nonevsInklinglowGemini 3.1 Flash LiteminimalvsInklinglowQwen3.5-35B-A3BnonevsInklinglowGPT-5 NanomediumvsInklinglowNemotron 3 UltranoneFree AvailablevsInklinglowQwen3.5-35B-A3BmediumvsInklinglowGemini 2.5 FlashnonevsInklinglowNorth Mini CodemediumFree AvailablevsKimi K2.6none