Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

AI BENCHY Compare

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-Flash

Summary

Kimi K2.5 vs Qwen3.5-Flash benchmark comparison: Qwen3.5-Flash leads on average score with 6.1 vs 5.5. Qwen3.5-Flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.005 vs $0.027. Qwen3.5-Flash is faster at 3.58s vs 13.18s, with pass rates of 34.9% vs 39.7%.

Recommended model: Qwen3.5-Flash - It has the best score here (6.1), while costing about 6.5x less than Kimi K2.5.

Last updated at: 2026-07-09

Metric Kimi K2.5 Kimi K2.5 none Release: 2026-01-27 Qwen3.5-Flash Qwen3.5-Flash none Release: 2026-02-24
Score 5.5 6.1
Rank #135 #112
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.9 9.7
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 34.9% 39.7%
Flaky tests 3 1
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 0.442 0.075
Total Cost $0.027 $0.005
Input Price $0.375 / 1M $0.065 / 1M
Output Price $2.025 / 1M $0.260 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 36,034 46,439
Output Tokens 6,657 4,276
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 13.18s 3.58s
Response Time (max) 42.13s 27.18s
Response Time (total) 184.47s 75.28s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#135 MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5

none
Cost
$0.015
Time
89.1s
Tokens
5,421 tok

#112 Qwen3.5-Flash

none
Cost
$0.003
Time
47.4s
Tokens
7,799 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Anti-AI Tricks Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Kimi K2.5 3.6 8.4 8.3% 1 6.24s 652 373 0
Qwen3.5-Flash 3.5 8.3 8.3% 1 1.32s 696 690 0
Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Kimi K2.5 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 24.56s 7,311 4,708 0
Qwen3.5-Flash 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 850ms 7,913 519 0
Combined Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Kimi K2.5 2.8 2.1 33.3% 1 19.16s 12,264 748 0
Qwen3.5-Flash 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 6.22s 18,879 1,794 0
Data parsing and extraction Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Kimi K2.5 7.3 5.8 83.3% 1 42.13s 7,180 187 0
Qwen3.5-Flash 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 1.57s 7,794 243 0
Domain specific Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Kimi K2.5 5.3 10.0 33.3% 0 4.38s 753 29 0
Qwen3.5-Flash 7.7 10.0 66.7% 0 905ms 789 15 0
General Intelligence Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Kimi K2.5 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 4.00s 483 76 0
Qwen3.5-Flash 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 803ms 522 100 0
Instructions following Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Kimi K2.5 6.5 10.0 50.0% 0 2.67s 677 60 0
Qwen3.5-Flash 6.3 10.0 50.0% 0 8.81s 711 63 0
Puzzle Solving Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Kimi K2.5 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 4.04s 667 236 0
Qwen3.5-Flash 3.1 10.0 0.0% 0 10.89s 714 579 0
Tool Calling Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Kimi K2.5 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 13.99s 5,835 220 0
Qwen3.5-Flash 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 3.67s 8,211 264 0
Trivia Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Kimi K2.5 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 3.90s 212 20 0
Qwen3.5-Flash 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 588ms 210 9 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair