- Rank
- #122
- Total Output Tokens
- 220,942
- Response Time (avg)
- 98.19s
- Total Cost
- $0.607
Kimi K2.5 (medium) vs GLM 5.1 (medium)
The average score is effectively tied at 7.0 vs 7.0. Kimi K2.5 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.607 vs $0.727. GLM 5.1 (medium) is faster at 58.80s vs 98.19s, with pass rates of 63.6% vs 65.2%.
- Rank
- #117
- Total Output Tokens
- 215,889
- Response Time (avg)
- 58.80s
- Total Cost
- $0.727
Recommended model
Kimi K2.5 (medium)
It has the strongest score in this comparison (7.0) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.
Detailed comparison
| Metric | Kimi K2.5 Kimi K2.5 medium | GLM 5.1 GLM 5.1 medium |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 7.0 | 7.0 |
| Rank | #122 | #117 |
| Reliability | 10.0 | 8.1 |
| Consistency | 7.0 | 8.4 |
| Attempts | 66/66 | 66/66 |
| Tests Correct | ||
| Attempt pass rate | 63.6% | 65.2% |
| Flaky tests | 8 | 4 |
| Total Runs | 66 | 66 |
| Cost per result | 4.849 | 6.923 |
| Total Cost | $0.607 | $0.727 |
| Input Price | $0.571 / 1M | $0.966 / 1M |
| Output Price | $2.850 / 1M | $3.036 / 1M |
| Total Input Tokens | 118,496 | 82,592 |
| Output Tokens | 53,522 | 16,089 |
| Reasoning Tokens | 167,420 | 199,800 |
| Response Time (avg) | 98.19s | 58.80s |
| Response Time (max) | 281.00s | 308.75s |
| Response Time (total) | 1571.05s | 1234.72s |
| Parameters | 1T total (32B active) | 744B total (40B active) |
| Availability | Weights available | Open source |
Model generation showcase
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#122 MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5
medium- Cost
- $0.030
- Time
- 58.6s
- Tokens
- 8,683 tok
#117 GLM 5.1
medium
Invalid SVG
- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 300.0s
- Tokens
- 0 tok
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Category Breakdown
Quick Compare
Switch Comparison Pair
GPT-5.5nonevsGLM 5.1mediumKimi K2.5mediumvsGPT-5.5noneGPT-5.6 SolnonevsGLM 5.1mediumSeed-2.0-CodehighvsKimi K2.5mediumKimi K2.5mediumvsGPT-5.6 SolnoneSeed-2.0-CodehighvsGLM 5.1mediumSolar Pro 4highvsGLM 5.1mediumGemini 3.5 FlashnonevsKimi K2.5mediumStep 3.7 FlashlowvsGLM 5.1mediumKimi K2.5mediumvsSolar Pro 4highKimi K2.5mediumvsStep 3.7 FlashhighMuse Glimmer 30BlowvsGLM 5.1medium