Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Kimi K2.5 (medium) vs Qwen3.7 Flash (medium)

The average score is effectively tied at 7.0 vs 7.0. Qwen3.7 Flash (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.064 vs $0.600. Qwen3.7 Flash (medium) is faster at 45.90s vs 99.00s, with pass rates of 65.2% vs 65.2%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-28

Rank
#87
Total Output Tokens
227,367
Response Time (avg)
99.00s
Total Cost
$0.600
Rank
#91
Total Output Tokens
462,623
Response Time (avg)
45.90s
Total Cost
$0.064
Recommended model Qwen3.7 Flash (medium)

It has the best score here (7.0), while costing about 9.4x less than Kimi K2.5 (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Kimi K2.5 Kimi K2.5 medium Release: 2026-01-27 Qwen3.7 Flash Qwen3.7 Flash medium Release: 2026-07-28
Score 7.0 7.0
Rank #87 #91
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 7.0 7.5
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 65.2% 65.2%
Flaky tests 8 7
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 4.789 0.636
Total Cost $0.600 $0.064
Input Price $0.571 / 1M $0.030 / 1M
Output Price $2.850 / 1M $0.130 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 118,448 114,468
Output Tokens 62,124 12,786
Reasoning Tokens 165,243 449,837
Response Time (avg) 99.00s 45.90s
Response Time (max) 281.00s 593.64s
Response Time (total) 1485.04s 1009.84s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#87 MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5

medium
Cost
$0.030
Time
58.6s
Tokens
8,683 tok

#91 Qwen3.7 Flash

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
600.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Kimi K2.5 6.1 4.6 66.7% 2 217.49s 6,935 5,705 74,693
Qwen3.7 Flash 6.2 6.9 55.6% 1 46.78s 7,893 563 61,902

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair