Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Mistral Small 4 vs Qwen3.6 35B A3B

Qwen3.6 35B A3B leads on average score with 5.3 vs 5.1. Mistral Small 4 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.022 vs $0.061. Mistral Small 4 is faster at 1.20s vs 5.52s, with pass rates of 25.8% vs 31.8%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Rank
#179
Total Output Tokens
9,812
Response Time (avg)
1.20s
Total Cost
$0.022
Rank
#175
Total Output Tokens
46,957
Response Time (avg)
5.52s
Total Cost
$0.061
Recommended model Mistral Small 4

Its score stays close to the best score here (5.1 vs 5.3), while costing about 2.8x less than Qwen3.6 35B A3B.

Detailed comparison

Metric Mistral Small 4 Mistral Small 4 none Release: 2026-03-16 Qwen3.6 35B A3B Qwen3.6 35B A3B none Release: 2026-04-20
Score 5.1 5.3
Rank #179 #175
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.6 7.7
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 25.8% 31.8%
Flaky tests 1 6
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.432 1.496
Total Cost $0.022 $0.061
Input Price $0.150 / 1M $0.140 / 1M
Output Price $0.600 / 1M $1.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 104,708 93,979
Output Tokens 9,812 46,957
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 1.20s 5.52s
Response Time (max) 13.16s 39.54s
Response Time (total) 26.38s 110.40s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#179 Mistral Small 4

none
Cost
$0.002
Time
10.4s
Tokens
2,370 tok

#175 Qwen3.6 35B A3B

none
Cost
$0.008
Time
30.1s
Tokens
6,317 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Mistral Small 4 3.7 9.7 0.0% 0 901ms 7,636 619 0
Qwen3.6 35B A3B 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 8.77s 7,911 11,161 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair