Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Meituan: LongCat 2.0 vs Meituan: LongCat 2.0

LongCat 2.0 (low) leads on average score with 6.7 vs 6.6. LongCat 2.0 (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.391 vs $0.469. LongCat 2.0 (low) is faster at 100.31s vs 148.73s, with pass rates of 53.0% vs 53.0%.

Recommended modelLongCat 2.0 (low)It has the strongest score in this comparison (6.7) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Last updated at: 2026-07-20

Metric LongCat 2.0 LongCat 2.0 high Release: 2026-07-20 LongCat 2.0 LongCat 2.0 low Release: 2026-07-20
Score 6.6 6.7
Rank #97 #91
Reliability 9.4 9.6
Consistency 8.2 8.9
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 53.0% 53.0%
Flaky tests 5 3
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 5.202 3.910
Total Cost $0.469 $0.391
Input Price $0.300 / 1M $0.300 / 1M
Output Price $1.200 / 1M $1.200 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 93,357 90,909
Output Tokens 30,466 5,679
Reasoning Tokens 336,325 297,369
Response Time (avg) 148.73s 100.31s
Response Time (max) 941.66s 560.39s
Response Time (total) 3272.00s 2206.82s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#97 LongCat 2.0

high
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
600.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#91 LongCat 2.0

low
Cost
$0.024
Time
428.0s
Tokens
19,557 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
LongCat 2.0 7.6 7.2 77.8% 1 505.33s 6,913 244 192,377
LongCat 2.0 6.6 4.6 77.8% 2 479.30s 6,544 461 206,627

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair